Wednesday, June 30, 2021

Donald Rumsfeld, US defence secretary under George W Bush and Gerald Ford, dies at 88

Donald Rumsfeld, the secretary of defence for former presidents Gerald Ford and George W Bush, who presided over America’s Cold War strategies in the 1970s and, in the new world of terrorism decades later, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, died on Tuesday at his home in Taos, New Mexico. He was 88.

The cause was multiple myeloma, said Keith Urbahn, a spokesman for the family.

Encores are hardly rare in Washington, but Rumsfeld had the distinction of being the only defence chief to serve two nonconsecutive terms: 1975 to 1977 under Ford, and 2001 to 2006 under Bush. He also was the youngest, at 43, and the oldest, at 74, to hold the post — first in an era of Soviet-American nuclear perils, then in an age of subtler menace by terrorists and rogue states.

A staunch ally of former vice-president Dick Cheney, who had been his protégé and friend for years, Rumsfeld was a combative infighter who seemed to relish conflicts as he challenged Cabinet rivals, members of Congress and military orthodoxies. And he was widely regarded in his second tour as the most powerful defence secretary since Robert McNamara during the Vietnam War.

Like his counterpart of long ago, Rumsfeld in Iraq waged a costly and divisive war that ultimately destroyed his political life and outlived his tenure by many years. But unlike McNamara, who offered mea culpas in a 2003 documentary, The Fog of War, Rumsfeld acknowledged no serious failings and warned in a farewell valedictory at the Pentagon that quitting Iraq would be a terrible mistake, even though the war, the country learned, had been based on a false premise — that Saddam Hussein, the Iraqi leader, had been harbouring weapons of mass destruction.

“A conclusion by our enemies that the United States lacks the will or the resolve to carry out our missions that demand sacrifice and demand patience is every bit as dangerous as an imbalance of conventional military power,” he said. “It may well be comforting to some to consider graceful exits from the agonies and, indeed, the ugliness of combat. But the enemy thinks differently.”

In his 2011 memoir, Known and Unknown, Rumsfeld, more than four years out of office, still expressed no regrets over the decision to invade Iraq, which had cost the United States $700 billion and 4,400 American lives, insisting that the removal of Saddam had justified the effort. “Ridding the region of Saddam’s brutal regime has created a more stable and secure world,” he wrote.

He sidestepped the issue of whether the Iraq War had diverted resources from Afghanistan, leading to a Taliban resurgence there. “It was precisely during the toughest period in the Iraq War that Afghanistan, with coalition help, took some of its most promising steps toward a free and better future,” he declared.

Positions of power

Rumsfeld had been an athlete at Princeton and a Navy fighter pilot after the Korean War, and when he got to Washington in 1957 he seemed like an All-American who had stepped off the Wheaties box — a strikingly handsome Midwesterner radiating confidence, taking on big tasks and doing everything well. He worked for a couple of congressmen, then was elected to four terms in the House of Representatives himself.

He worked for four presidents in a succession of personal triumphs, migrating from Capitol Hill to the Richard Nixon administration’s Office of Economic Opportunity, to the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation as ambassador, and into the Ford White House as chief of staff. Between Pentagon stints, he was former president Ronald Reagan’s special envoy to the Middle East and made fortunes as an executive with pharmaceutical, electronics and biotechnology companies.

As Bush’s defence secretary, Rumsfeld had hoped to modernise an antiquated military establishment by cutting the bloated Pentagon bureaucracy, streamlining weapons systems, developing a missile defence shield and creating smaller, more mobile and lethal forces that could move swiftly around the globe to put down regional flare-ups in the new century.

But his innovative plans were all but forgotten on the morning of 11 September, 2001, when terrorists crashed hijacked jetliners into the twin towers of the World Trade Centre in New York and into the Pentagon, killing nearly 3,000 people. (A fourth plane went down in a field in Pennsylvania after passengers had tried to regain control.)

Rumsfeld was in his Pentagon office that day as the building shook and collapsed on one side. As 20,000 military and civilian employees were evacuated, he helped carry the wounded into ambulances. Through the day, as Bush was shuttled from a Florida school visit to secure locales in Louisiana and Nebraska and Cheney took charge at the White House, Rumsfeld, in a Pentagon bunker, conveyed orders to safeguard national leaders, activate defence measures across the country and place American forces on alert around the world.

That evening he held a televised news conference. “The United States government is functioning in the face of this terrible act,” Rumsfeld said, and he announced that the Pentagon would be open for business in the morning.

As Americans woke to a perilous new era, Bush declared war on terrorism, and Rumsfeld became chief executor of the strategic plans. In October, American forces invaded Afghanistan to suppress a fanatical Taliban regime that had sheltered terrorists and imposed a brutal theocracy on the Afghan people, and to hunt for Osama bin Laden, who had masterminded the 11 September attacks.

And in 2003, with Bush and Cheney insisting that Saddam was allied with Al-Qaeda, that he was harbouring weapons of mass destruction and that he would soon threaten the world, Rumsfeld deployed forces in Iraq for a preemptive strike. Baghdad fell in three weeks, and Iraqi military resistance quickly faded. But the short war gave way to a long struggle against internecine fighting and a resolute insurgency. Saddam was captured and executed, but no weapons of mass destruction were ever found.

In Afghanistan and Iraq, the defence secretary had argued for the minimal force levels needed to achieve victories, an idea codified as the Rumsfeld Doctrine. But critics said that he had no viable plan for the postwar era in either country, and that his determination to strike in Iraq with a light, fast force had crippled the military’s postwar ability to restore order and contain the sectarian violence and a widening insurgency.

Rumsfeld contested that idea in his memoir. “Too many troops could hurt our ability to win Iraqi confidence,” he wrote, “and it could translate into more casualties, because more troops would mean more targets for our enemies.”

Coming under attack

Over the next three years, as casualties mounted and the American public grew restive, the sectarian violence brought Iraq to the brink of civil war. There was even talk of an unthinkable defeat for the Americans.

Rumsfeld, who briefed Bush daily and was his chief spokesman on the war, came to embody what critics called the administration’s misjudgments and arrogance in a war gone wrong. He was accused of refusing to admit mistakes or change direction, of being slow to adopt counterinsurgency tactics, and of relying on a closed circle of hawkish advisers, including Paul Wolfowitz and Douglas Feith.

While it was not up to Rumsfeld to fix troop strengths in Iraq, he was often blamed for keeping insufficient forces on the ground. And beyond his conduct of the war, many critics, including human rights groups and a bipartisan Senate committee, said he should face criminal charges for decisions that had led to the abuse of detainees at Abu Ghraib prison, near Baghdad, and at the Guantánamo Bay detention camp in Cuba.

Rumsfeld, in his memoir, blamed “a small group of prison guards who ran amok in the absence of adequate supervision” for the Abu Ghraib abuse and said he regretted not having resigned in the wake of the scandal. He said that he had twice offered to quit, but that Bush had turned him down. He also portrayed his department as a reluctant jailer at Guantánamo Bay, and said that the interrogation techniques he had authorised were less extreme than some used by the CIA.

As the midterm elections of 2006 approached, with the war in its fourth year and public frustration at a pitch, Bush prepared to discard Rumsfeld, who had become a lightning rod for criticism of the war. Rumsfeld drafted an eleventh-hour memo acknowledging that the Iraq strategy was not working and calling for a major course correction.

But it was too late. The chorus calling for his dismissal included the voices of many Republicans and senior military officials and, reportedly, that of the first lady, Laura Bush. The president publicly expressed his unconditional support, but after the Democrats won control of Congress, he announced Rumsfeld’s resignation and named Robert Gates, a former director of central intelligence, as his successor.

In retrospect, military experts gave Rumsfeld high marks for his first term in the Pentagon, and for trying to modernise the military in his second. But they faulted his handling of the Iraq War, held him to account for the mistreatment of prisoners, and said he had alienated colleagues and the public with his imperious style.

He was defiant to the last, however. “I have benefited greatly from the criticism,” he said, invoking Winston Churchill on the day he resigned, “and at no time have I suffered from the lack thereof.”

In a statement released Wednesday, Bush said: “On the morning of 11 September, 2001, Donald Rumsfeld ran to the fire at the Pentagon to assist the wounded and ensure the safety of survivors. For the next five years, he was in steady service as a wartime secretary of defence — a duty he carried out with strength, skill, and honour.”

A son of Illinois

Donald Henry Rumsfeld was born in Evanston, Illinois, a suburb of Chicago, on July 9, 1932, to George and Jeanette (Huster) Rumsfeld. His parents were successful real estate agents, and in 1937 the family moved to nearby Winnetka, where Donald and his sister, Joan, attended both private and public schools.

He was an excellent student and became an Eagle Scout and an athlete. After graduating from New Trier High School in 1950, he attended Princeton on scholarships, majored in political science, was captain of the wrestling and football teams and graduated in 1954.

That year he married his high school sweetheart, Joyce Pierson. She survives him, as do their three children, Valerie Richard, Marcy Rumsfeld and Nicholas Rumsfeld; seven grandchildren; and three great-grandchildren. Rumsfeld had homes in Washington and St. Michaels, Maryland, in addition to his ranch in Taos.

Rumsfeld joined the Navy in 1954 and became a jet fighter pilot and flight instructor. He left active service as a lieutenant (junior grade) in 1957, though he continued to fly and take administrative assignments in the Naval Reserve for many years.

He went to Washington in 1957 and for a few years was an aide to two Republican congressmen, David Dennison of Ohio and Robert Griffin of Michigan. The experience whetted his appetite for politics. After working briefly as a banker, Rumsfeld, at 30, won a seat in Congress as a Republican in 1962, representing an affluent district north of Chicago.

In the House, he backed Gerald Ford’s successful bid for the Republican leadership and compiled a generally conservative voting record, opposing the social programmes of former presidents John F Kennedy and Lyndon B Johnson and taking a hard line on Cuba’s dictator, Fidel Castro. But he also voted for the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964 and for freedom of information laws. He easily won reelection in 1964, 1966 and 1968.

In 1968, he was Nixon’s floor manager at the Republican National Convention in Miami Beach and campaigned energetically in his successful race against Vice President Hubert Humphrey.

Impressed with his performance, Nixon in 1969 asked Rumsfeld to run the Office of Economic Opportunity, the federal anti-poverty agency. Rumsfeld quit his House seat to accept the post.

The appointment alarmed critics. Rumsfeld had opposed the agency’s creation, as well as food stamps and Medicare. He did not dismantle the agency, as some had feared, but he pared it down sharply.

Rumsfeld became known as a tough administrator who slashed costs and personnel in social programs, and as an aggressive bureaucratic infighter who made enemies but got things done. In 1971 and 1972, he ran Nixon’s Cost of Living Council, administering wage and price controls. He also joined the inner circle of Nixon advisors, including his chief of staff, HR Haldeman, and his domestic advisor, John Ehrlichman.

But as the Watergate scandal began to disrupt the White House in 1973, Rumsfeld was named ambassador to NATO. He was thus in Brussels when Nixon and many of his top aides were forced to resign. After Ford assumed the presidency in 1974, Rumsfeld was called back to the White House as his chief of staff. He soon installed his own aides and a staff system that diminished the influence of others.

Memos like snowflakes

When Ford named him defense secretary in 1975, Rumsfeld faced formidable problems. The Vietnam War had ended, and an all-volunteer force was in its infancy. Troop morale was low, drug scandals and racial tensions were rife, and his predecessor, James Schlesinger, had been fired, partly for clashing with then-secretary of state Henry Kissinger and others.

Although Rumsfeld was steeped in Washington’s wiles, he knew little about the Pentagon. But he learned fast and tried to fit into the macho military world by demonstrating his one-handed push-ups and his prowess on a squash court. His memos — a hallmark of Rumsfeld communications in government and the private sector for years — began drifting down on the Pentagon and came to be known as snowflakes.

Publicly warning of “adverse trends” — meaning Soviet strengths and American weaknesses — Rumsfeld called for buildups of conventional and strategic forces, budget increases and the development of cruise missiles, B-1 bombers, F-16 fighters and other weapons systems. It was an ambitious program for what proved to be a limited term.

Ford’s defeat by Jimmy Carter in the 1976 presidential election cut Rumsfeld’s tenure to just 14 months, too short for sweeping initiatives. But he made a strong impression as an able steward of the Pentagon bureaucracy; he even once managed to outmaneuver Kissinger spectacularly by withdrawing Pentagon support for an arms control agreement that Kissinger was on the verge of completing in Moscow in 1976.

The move killed SALT II negotiations for the remainder of the Ford administration, depriving the president of a major foreign policy coup. Nevertheless, Ford in 1977 awarded Rumsfeld the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the nation’s highest civilian honor.

Leaving government for the first time in 15 years, Rumsfeld became president and chief executive of GD Searle and Co, the pharmaceutical maker, which was struggling. He turned the company around by cutting costs, selling subsidiaries and developing the artificial sweetener NutraSweet, which made billions after its approval by the Food and Drug Administration. In 1985, the company was sold to Monsanto, a move that made Rumsfeld wealthy.

On leave from Searle for six months in 1983 and 1984, Rumsfeld was Ronald Reagan’s special envoy to West Asia. He became a conduit for extending American intelligence and military aid to Iraq, then at war with neighbouring Iran. American support for Iraq’s dictatorship and Rumsfeld’s meetings with Saddam were not particularly controversial at a time of mounting concern over the expansion of Iran’s Islamic Revolution.

Having flirted with political races from time to time, Rumsfeld explored runs for the US Senate in 1986 and for the Republican presidential nomination in 1988 and 1996, but did not pursue them. In 1996, he was the national campaign chairman for Bob Dole, the Republican presidential nominee, who lost to the incumbent, Bill Clinton.

Making his fortune

From 1990 to 1993, Rumsfeld was chairman and chief executive of the General Instrument Corp., an electronics manufacturer that specialised in cable, satellite and ground-based broadcasting applications and pioneered the first all-digital high-definition television technology. Rumsfeld took the company public and made another fortune.

From 1997 to 2001, he was chairman of Gilead Sciences, the developer of Tamiflu, used in the treatment of bird flu. After he became defence secretary in 2001, he recused himself from any decisions involving Gilead, but his holdings in the company grew substantially when avian flu prompted widespread anxiety over a possible pandemic.

Over the years, questions were raised about Rumsfeld’s work as a director of many corporations, including some defense contractors. But he denied any wrongdoing, and none was ever demonstrated.

His complex character — he was a creative and dedicated reformer to admirers, a vain and egotistical bully to detractors — was the subject of endless debate and analysis in public forums, newspaper and magazine articles, television documentaries and books.

Andrew Cockburn, in Rumsfeld: His Rise, Fall and Catastrophic Legacy (2007), called him an inveterate schemer who had tried to evade responsibility for disastrous failures.

Bradley Graham’s By His Own Rules: The Ambitions, Successes and Ultimate Failures of Donald Rumsfeld (2009) drew a more nuanced portrait of a man of wisdom, ruthlessness and ambition, but concluded that Iraq had doomed his career and the lives of thousands.

On the day of Rumsfeld’s resignation, Graham wrote, “the tally of U.S. troops who had died in the Iraq War had reached 2,939,” the “number wounded in action had exceeded 22,000,” and “countless others were mentally and emotionally traumatised from the nightmarish conflict.”

In 2007, after leaving government service, Rumsfeld created the Rumsfeld Foundation to encourage public service with study fellowships and grants to support the growth of free political and economic systems abroad.

He was the subject of a documentary, The Unknown Known (2014), by filmmaker Errol Morris, who interviewed him about his years of government service. The title, like that of Rumsfeld’s memoir, Known and Unknown, referred to his comment at a 2002 news conference in which he argued that a major Pentagon objective was to evaluate “unknown knowns” — or “the things you think you know, that it turns out you did not.”

Robert D McFadden c.2021 The New York Times Company

This article originally appeared in The New York Times



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3h4MIRI

The rise of the harmaenials: How older South Korean women are emerging as the country's newest social media influencers

Seoul: The freshest faces among South Korean influencers are no longer the usual, 20-something celebrities. Instead, entertainment and social media are focusing on a new generation: the elder generation.

Older women were once invisible in South Korean entertainment as the industry stuck to rigidly conservative traditional female roles and cast them only as devoted mothers.

But older women are front and center in recent advertising and entertainment series.

A pioneer in the trend is Oscar winner Youn Yuh-jung, the 74-year-old Minari actor who promotes Oriental Brewery beer and the Zig Zag shopping app in two recent ad campaigns.

The beer video highlights the novelty of its spokesperson, who says: “For someone like me to be on a beer ad, the world has gotten so much better.” With a Cass beer in her hand, Youn says she makes friends by being her authentic self and alludes to the beer helping people to dissipate their social awkwardness.

South Korean producer Kim Sehee said Youn’s Oscar win earlier this year inspired his entertainment series, Wassup K-Grandma. He said young South Korean people have a new interest in their elders, birthing a new word harmaenial — a portmanteau of the South Korean word “harmoni,” or grandmother, and the English word “millennial.”

The series broadcast in May was one of the first Korean shows to feature grandmothers as main characters, according to Kim. It brought international guests to live as temporary sons-in-law with Korean grandmothers. The colour of the series came from the grandmothers’ attempts to communicate with their foreign in-laws and share homemade meals and decades-old ginseng alcohol.

Park Makrye, a popular South Korean YouTuber, said the country’s attitude towards gender and age has been rapidly changing. “Back in the day, people thought women were supposed to be only housewives cooking at home, but that’s once upon a time. People must adapt to the current era,” she said.

Park, 74, is one of the leading lights in the South Korean frenzy. Her YouTube channel Korea Grandma has over 1.32 million subscribers. In her videos, Park throws expletives while reviewing a Korean drama and screams her lungs out while paragliding for the first time.

Park’s success has paved the way for others. Jang Myung-sook gives out fashion and lifestyles tips on her channel  Milanonna, a nonagenarian known as Grandma “Gganzi” raps and shares personal stories about living through the Japanese colonisation, and a 76-year-old YouTuber flaunts her “single life” on “G-gourmet.”

“I would like to tell grandmothers to try everything they want to do and not be concerned with their age,” Park told The Associated Press. “For young people...You’ll be OK as long as you are healthy,” she said. “Please fight on and best of luck.”



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3hpUhS1

Explained: How Ethiopia led by Nobel Peace Prize winner Abiy Ahmed got caught in a civil war again

News of rebel forces in Ethiopia's northernmost Tigray region seizing the provincial capital was followed by the announcement of a ceasefire by the country's federal government, led by the 2019 Nobel Peace prize winner Abiy Ahmed. Fighting for control of the region had erupted in November last year and has in the months since sparked concerns of ethnic cleansing and starvation. Here's what you need to know.

Why did the Tigray region rebel?

Cornered into fighting for the region they dominate, Tigrayans were once the most politically significant community in Ethiopia and called the shots in the Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF) coalition that had seized control of the country after a long-drawn-out civil war that started in the 1970s and ended only in 1991.

Although Tigrayans made up only a small fraction of the people of Ethiopia, which is the second most populous country in Africa, they were seen as enjoying outsized influence and clout in Ethiopian government and society.

The EPRDP coalition included people from four different regions. Along with the Tigray People's Liberation Front (TPLF), which represented the eponymous region, the grouping comprised the Amhara Democratic Party, the Oromo Democratic Party and the Southern Ethiopian People’s Democratic Movement. Between the four of them, these parties represented most of the ethnic groups in Ethiopia, which since 1994 has been split into largely autonomous states, now numbering 10, but with federal institutions.

But discontent spread among the people and, in 2018, the other constituents of the EPRDP coalition turned against the Tigrayan members, leading to the resignation of the then prime minister and the appointment of Abiy Ahmed, who belonged to the Oromo ethnic group, as the replacement.

But Ahmed, who would go on to win the Nobel Peace prize the next year for his efforts to resolve Ethiopia's border conflict with neighbouring Eritrea, would soon come to be seen as trying to bring about greater consolidation of federal power in the country, which did not sit well with the TPLF.

How did fighting start?

One of the tasks Ahmed was supposed to have taken up after becoming prime minister was of reforming the EPRDP but, in November 2019, he launched a new outfit instead, the Prosperity Party (PP). However, the TPLF decided against joining this front and that is the point from when the slide started in relations between the Tigray government, which was still under TPLF, and the federal government headed by Ahmed.

National elections were to have been held in 2020, but the Ethiopian parliament voted to postpone them in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. That prompted the TPLF to accuse Ahmed of trying to grab power.

Tigray then went ahead and conducted its own regional elections, but the federal government in Addis Ababa refused to recognise the result. Thereafter, the Ethiopian parliament cut funds meant for Tigray. When Tigray rebels allegedly seized an army base in November last year, Ahmed ordered airstrikes in the region and Ethiopia found itself caught in a new civil war.

How did the ceasefire come about?

Ethiopian federal forces that moved in to Tigray as fighting broke out with the rebels were helped by soldiers from the Eritrean army and militias from the Amhara state. The government forces managed to seize control of Mekelle, the Tigrayan capital in November and there was a recent flare-up of the fighting in the region.

The BBC reported that "a rapid offensive" saw the rebels seize control of Mekelle on Monday and that was followed by a ceasefire announcement by the federal government.

The government said that it had called the ceasefire to allow farming activity in the planting season and enable humanitarian aid to reach people affected by the fighting.

Ahmed is seen as enjoying support among the international community and the latest developments may have sparked fears about stability in Ethiopia with reports saying that there is speculation on what the civil war means for Ethiopian unity.

Following the ceasefire declaration, reports said that Eritrean troops were seen retreating back across the border. But a rebel spokesman said that Tigrayan fighters will press on to consolidate their gains.

"We have to ensure that the enemy, whether from the Eritrean side or Amhara side or Addis Ababa, doesn't have the capability to threaten the security of our people anymore," he said.

What are the humanitarian concerns?

According to reports, months of fighting has left thousands dead and more than 3,50,000 people are facing starvation as supply lines were hit. Also, more than two million people are reportedly displaced.

There have been allegations of ethnic cleansing and rape and widespread looting. Reports say that such atrocities have been mostly attributed to the coalition fighters with Ahmed admitting in March reports that "indicate(d) that atrocities have been committed in Tigray region".



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3AdDeuK

Phuket sandbox: A promotional campaign in Thailand aims at boosting tourism post COVID-19 outbreak

Somsak Betlao covered the outboard motor on his traditional wooden longtail boat with a tarp, wrapping up another day on Phuket’s Patong beach where not a single tourist needed his services shuttling them to nearby islands.

Since Thailand’s pandemic restrictions on travel were imposed in early 2020, tourism has fallen off a cliff, and nowhere has it been felt more than the resort island off the country’s southern coast, where nearly 95 percent of the economy is related to the industry.

So, despite spiking coronavirus numbers elsewhere in the country, the government is forging ahead with a program known as the “Phuket sandbox” to reopen the island to fully vaccinated visitors. It hopes it will revive tourism — a sector that accounted for 20 percent of the country’s economy before the pandemic.

Instead of the hotel quarantines required elsewhere in Thailand, tourists on Phuket will be able to roam the entire island, but not travel to other parts of the country for 14 days. Sceptics question whether people will be willing to accept multiple restrictions including repeated virus tests and mandatory tracking apps, but officials hope the allure of the island’s famous beaches — and the idea of a beach holiday following lengthy lockdowns — will be enough.

For islanders like Somsak, there is a lot riding on the tourists’ return.

Once he could count on earning more than US$ 100 a day taking them out on his boat, but this month he has taken home only US$ 40 from a single customer and has been forced to do odd jobs, pawn family belongings and fish for food to put dinner on the table for his wife and two young children.

“If it does not work we will just have to try and stay alive,” Somsak said.

The first two months of 2020, before travel restrictions were put in place, were among Phuket’s best ever, and the island saw more than 3 million visitors in the first five months of the year, including more than 2 million foreigners. For the first five months of 2021, there have been fewer than a half million visitors, and all but about 5,000 were domestic travellers.

Under the sandbox plan, visitors to Phuket will be subject to most of the same controls faced by those to the rest of the country, but instead of being quarantined in a carefully monitored hotel room for 14 days they’ll be restricted to Thailand’s largest island, where they can lounge on the white beaches, jet ski off the coast, and enjoy evenings eating out in restaurants.

“For people who have been closeted up in their apartments for 16 months, the idea to fly to Thailand where there’s a beach and you’re a normal guest, yes you’re being quarantined here but this is more than 500 square kilometres of quarantine and you’ve got national parks, golf courses, you can go diving — it’s really not a quarantine,” said Anthony Lark, president of the Phuket Hotels Association.

There is already some international interest, with the first flight arriving from Qatar, followed by one from Israel and then Singapore.

Still, some hotels and other businesses have decided to wait to see whether the tourists appear before they reopen, and there is scepticism in Thailand that they will.

The Bangkok Post newspaper wondered in an editorial this week headlined “Welcome to your prison vacation?” whether tourists would bother going through all the hoops for a holiday, especially after the government’s announcement that it would impose additional restrictions if more than 90 new virus cases are reported per week in Phuket.

Lark said he anticipates a lot of travellers will take a wait-and-see approach and that his expectations are “tepid.”

“The floodgates are not opening,” he said.

To visit, adult foreign visitors must provide proof of two vaccinations, a negative COVID-19 test no more than 72 hours before departure, and proof of an insurance policy that covers treatment for the virus of at least US$ 100,000, among other things. Once on the island, visitors have to follow mask and distancing regulations and take three COVID-19 tests at their own expense — about US$ 300 total — and show negative results.

They also have to come from countries considered no higher than “low” or “medium” risk — a list currently including most of Europe, the U.S. and Canada — and fly directly to Phuket, though plans are in the works to allow carefully controlled transfers through Bangkok’s airport.

After 14 days, visitors are free to travel further in Thailand without other restrictions.

In preparation, some 70 percent of the island’s approximately 450,000 residents have had at least one vaccine dose, and the hospitality industry reports that all front-line workers in restaurants, hotels and elsewhere have been fully vaccinated.

Bars and clubs remain closed, but visitors will be able to go to restaurants and take in shows — once they’re up and running again.

At the Phuket Simon Cabaret, a 600-seat venue that has been closed for more than a year, some crew returned this week to start checking lighting and other systems, while workers spruced up the dresses worn by its transgender dancers, sewing on new glitter and colourful feathers.

“We are entering into this fight wanting to win,” owner Pornthep Rouyrin said defiantly, adding that the cabaret would not open immediately and that its dancers might start with smaller shows in hotels and restaurants until larger numbers of tourists start to arrive.

The Phuket sandbox is broadly part of Prime Minister Prayuth Chan-ocha’s plan announced earlier this month to have Thailand completely reopened within 120 days.

Polls suggest about 75 percent of Thais find that too ambitious, and in recent days coronavirus numbers have been spiking in Bangkok and elsewhere, underlining concerns just as Phuket is to be opened back up.

Other Thai destinations are watching Phuket closely, with their own plans to open later in the year or sooner, but with some degree of initial hotel room quarantine. Regionally, popular tourist destinations such as Bali are also keeping an eye on the sandbox as they mull over when they might be able to welcome outside visitors.

Nationally, the hotel industry had hoped the sandbox would provide a springboard to other destinations in Thailand when early discussions involved a shorter mandatory stay, but now that it’s 14 days the industry concedes few are likely to have the vacation time to carry further on.

At the same time, there’s concern that Thai residents returning home will route through Phuket to take advantage of the more lax rules, putting further stress on the hotels in Bangkok, which have relied on the two-week mandatory quarantines for much of their income during the pandemic, said Marisa Sukosol, president of the Thai Hotel Association.

About half of Thailand’s 16,000 hotels are still closed and occupancy rates averaged only 6 percent in May, she said.

“We are on survival mode, and hanging by a thread — literally,” she said earlier this month.

Though there are restrictions and it might take time to work out the kinks of reopening, the upside is that visitors will be greeted by a Phuket not seen for decades, thanks to the lack of people over the past year, Lark said.

“I’ve even seen sea otters on the beach and I didn’t even know there were sea otters here. I’ve seen pods of dolphins, we’ve noticed an increased diversity of bird species, the coral reefs have not had boats over them — the island has never looked better,” he said. “And the room rates are about half of 2019 and you never have to make a reservation to get a restaurant seat. It is a great time to come.”

***

Rising reported from Bangkok. Associated Press writer Chalida Ekvittayavechnukul in Bangkok contributed to this report.



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3dvtZwh

'Good day for our country': France adopts bill legalising IVF access for lesbian couples, single women

French gay rights campaigners celebrated a milestone for equal rights on Tuesday after parliament finalised adoption of a bill giving lesbian couples and single women access to fertility treatment for the first time.

Under current French law, only heterosexual couples have the right to access medically assisted procreation methods such as in vitro fertilisation (IVF).

Lesbian couples and single women who want children have to travel abroad for IVF using donor sperm.

That is set to change under the bill pushed through by President Emmanuel Macron's government, which passed a final vote in the National Assembly after two years of protests and 500 hours of debate.

The draft law, which was backed by 326 MPs to 115 against, with 42 abstentions, brings France in line with a dozen European countries, including Belgium, the Netherlands, Sweden and Spain, that do not discriminate between heterosexual and same-sex couples, or between couples and single women, when it comes to reproductive rights.

The Inter-LGBT association said it welcomed the change, which it described as a "forceps birth" after years of foot-dragging by successive governments and further delays wrought by the coronavirus pandemic.

A spokesman for the association of French same-sex families, Fabien Joly, has warned that demand is so strong it could lead to sperm bank shortages.

The government has promised to try to make up for lost time, saying that women will be able to begin treatment in the autumn with a view to becoming pregnant by the end of 2021.

"It's a good day for our country," Health Minister Olivier Veran told French public radio ahead of the vote.

Protests fizzled

While campaigning for president in 2017, Macron said he was in favour of extending fertility treatment to lesbian and single women.

But once elected, the centrist leader repeatedly put off changing the law, mindful of the mass protests triggered by a gay marriage bill in 2013 that caught the government of his predecessor, Francois Hollande, off guard.

However, public opinion this time is squarely behind the move, which will make France the 11th country in the 27-member EU to allow medically assisted procreation for lesbian couples and single women alike.

A recent Ifop poll found that 67 percent of French people supported the measure.

Calls for protests by the largely Catholic anti-gay marriage movement yielded only a tepid response.

Under the proposed law, which was first ratified by the National Assembly in October 2019 but then held up in the Senate, France's healthcare system will cover the cost of fertility procedures for all women under 43.

The right-wing Republicans party, which has a majority in the Senate, and the far-right National Rally (RN) had strongly opposed the bill.

"You will produce children that have been deprived of a father," Republicans MP Patrick Hetzel argued.

In the end the Senate grudgingly backed the bill after introducing hundreds of amendments, but right-wing lawmakers continued to resist having the state cover the cost of the treatment.

In the event of disagreements, the National Assembly, which is controlled by Macron's Republic on the Move party and its allies, has the final say.

The outcome of the vote on Macron's only major social reform so far is therefore seen as a foregone conclusion.

The legislation addresses several issues arising out of the huge increase in the use of fertility treatment in recent years.

Controversially, it allows children conceived with donor sperm to learn the donor's identity when they become adults, ending the anonymity that donors in France have been guaranteed until now.

And it allows women in their 30s to freeze their eggs — a procedure currently available only to women undergoing treatment for conditions that could impact their fertility, such as radiation therapy or chemotherapy for cancer.

But it stops short at legalising surrogacy, a practice used by some couples to have children that is still widely rejected in France.



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3h7pDxS

Bharat Biotech says 'no wrongdoing' amid Brazil Covaxin controversy; all you need to know

The Brazilian government on Wednesday announced the temporary suspension of its 20 million dose COVID-19 vaccine contract with Bharat Biotech following allegations of irregularities in the deal, with the Indian drugmaker insisting that it has not received any advance payments.

'No wrongdoing', says Bharat Biotech

The Hyderabad-based firm said it has not received any advance payments and that the company has followed a "similar approach" in Brazil towards contracts,  regulatory approvals and supplies in several countries worldwide, where Covaxin is being supplied successfully.

Bharat Biotech has denied any allegation of wrongdoing with respect to vaccine supply, saying in an emailed statement that it adheres to the highest standards of compliance. It said the company has not received any advance payments nor has it supplied any vaccines to Brazil.

"As of 29th June 2021, Bharat Biotech has not received any advance payments nor supplied any vaccines to MOH Brazil." "Bharat Biotech has followed a similar approach towards contracts, regulatory approvals and supplies in several countries worldwide, where Covaxin is being supplied successfully," it said in a statement.

Bharat Biotech has received advance payments from several other countries at the above price points, with supplies in process, pending approvals, Bharat Biotech said. The company follows a similar partnership model in all countries, where its vaccines are supplied, as it does not have its own offices there.

Bharat Biotech and Precisa Medicamentos are conducting a 5000-subject phase III clinical trial in Brazil, which was recently approved by Anvisa. The trial will be conducted by the Albert Einstein Institute, the vaccine maker said.

Precisa Medicamentos is Bharat Biotech's partner in Brazil, providing assistance, guidance, and support with regulatory submissions, licensure, distribution, insurance, conduct of phase III clinical trials, etc.

Here's what you need to know about the controversy:

What?

The Brazilian government, which had earlier agreed to purchase 20 million doses of Bharat Biotech’s COVID-19 vaccine Covaxin, announced the suspension of the contract following allegations of irregularities in the deal.

The controversy has turned up the heat on Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro who is accused of turning a a blind eye to possible corruption in the deal.

The contract was also evaluated by the Ministry of Health's Integrity Directorate, which will carry out an administrative investigation. The unit will act together with the "Controllership" in determining the terms of the contract, it further said.

Why?

The Covaxin contract to Brazil landed in controversy after the South American country's Attorney General reportedly launched a probe into the deal. The minister of the CGU, Wagner Rosrio, explained that suspension is a preventive measure.

"We opened a preliminary investigation last week, that is, a specific audit in relation to the contract. The suspension time will only last for the period of calculation.
We put the reinforced team to be very quick in the process," he said.

According to CGU's preliminary analysis, there are no irregularities in the contract, but, due to compliance, the @minsaude opted to suspend the contract for further
analysis," Brazil health minister Marcelo Queiroga tweeted.

Earlier, the National Health Surveillance Agency of Brazil- Anvisa, had denied permission to import Covaxin under Emergency Use Authorisation after authorities found that the Indian plant in which the jab was being made did not meet the Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) requirements.

However, Anvisa on 5 June gave clearance to the proposal to import Covaxin into the South American country, with some conditions.

When?

On 26 February, Bharat Biotech Ltd had said it entered into an agreement with the Brazilian government for the supply of 20 million doses of Covaxin during the second and third quarters of 2021.

The Emergency Use Authorisation for Covaxin was granted by Brazil on 4 June. The pricing of Covaxin has been clearly established between $15-20 per dose for supplies to governments outside India. The pricing for Brazil has also been indicated at $15 per dose.

With inputs from agencies



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3A92cf3

Bharat Biotech says 'no wrongdoing' amid Brazil Covaxin controversy; all you need to know

The Brazilian government on Wednesday announced the temporary suspension of its 20 million dose COVID-19 vaccine contract with Bharat Biotech following allegations of irregularities in the deal, with the Indian drugmaker insisting that it has not received any advance payments.

'No wrongdoing', says Bharat Biotech

The Hyderabad-based firm said it has not received any advance payments and that the company has followed a "similar approach" in Brazil towards contracts,  regulatory approvals and supplies in several countries worldwide, where Covaxin is being supplied successfully.

Bharat Biotech has denied any allegation of wrongdoing with respect to vaccine supply, saying in an emailed statement that it adheres to the highest standards of compliance. It said the company has not received any advance payments nor has it supplied any vaccines to Brazil.

"As of 29th June 2021, Bharat Biotech has not received any advance payments nor supplied any vaccines to MOH Brazil." "Bharat Biotech has followed a similar approach towards contracts, regulatory approvals and supplies in several countries worldwide, where Covaxin is being supplied successfully," it said in a statement.

Bharat Biotech has received advance payments from several other countries at the above price points, with supplies in process, pending approvals, Bharat Biotech said. The company follows a similar partnership model in all countries, where its vaccines are supplied, as it does not have its own offices there.

Bharat Biotech and Precisa Medicamentos are conducting a 5000-subject phase III clinical trial in Brazil, which was recently approved by Anvisa. The trial will be conducted by the Albert Einstein Institute, the vaccine maker said.

Precisa Medicamentos is Bharat Biotech's partner in Brazil, providing assistance, guidance, and support with regulatory submissions, licensure, distribution, insurance, conduct of phase III clinical trials, etc.

Here's what you need to know about the controversy:

What?

The Brazilian government, which had earlier agreed to purchase 20 million doses of Bharat Biotech’s COVID-19 vaccine Covaxin, announced the suspension of the contract following allegations of irregularities in the deal.

The controversy has turned up the heat on Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro who is accused of turning a a blind eye to possible corruption in the deal.

The contract was also evaluated by the Ministry of Health's Integrity Directorate, which will carry out an administrative investigation. The unit will act together with the "Controllership" in determining the terms of the contract, it further said.

Why?

The Covaxin contract to Brazil landed in controversy after the South American country's Attorney General reportedly launched a probe into the deal. The minister of the CGU, Wagner Rosrio, explained that suspension is a preventive measure.

"We opened a preliminary investigation last week, that is, a specific audit in relation to the contract. The suspension time will only last for the period of calculation.
We put the reinforced team to be very quick in the process," he said.

According to CGU's preliminary analysis, there are no irregularities in the contract, but, due to compliance, the @minsaude opted to suspend the contract for further
analysis," Brazil health minister Marcelo Queiroga tweeted.

Earlier, the National Health Surveillance Agency of Brazil- Anvisa, had denied permission to import Covaxin under Emergency Use Authorisation after authorities found that the Indian plant in which the jab was being made did not meet the Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) requirements.

However, Anvisa on 5 June gave clearance to the proposal to import Covaxin into the South American country, with some conditions.

When?

On 26 February, Bharat Biotech Ltd had said it entered into an agreement with the Brazilian government for the supply of 20 million doses of Covaxin during the second and third quarters of 2021.

The Emergency Use Authorisation for Covaxin was granted by Brazil on 4 June. The pricing of Covaxin has been clearly established between $15-20 per dose for supplies to governments outside India. The pricing for Brazil has also been indicated at $15 per dose.

With inputs from agencies



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3yd9T1X

Imran Khan says Pakistan under 'pressure' from US over China relations, vows never to buckle

Islamabad:  Prime Minister Imran Khan said on Tuesday that Pakistan was under "pressure" from the US and other Western powers over his country's all-weather ties with China and vowed to never buckle under pressure.

Pakistan and China enjoy a "very special relationship" spanning over 70 years and nothing could change these time-tested ties, Imran said in an interview with China's English-language State-broadcaster China Global Television Network (CGTN), an excerpt of which was shared on his Instagram account.

Talking about the evolving regional rivalry between the US and China, Imran said that "Pakistan thinks it is very unfair for the US or other powers – western power" to pressurise "countries like us to take sides" in a conflict with China.

"Why should we take sides? We should have good relations with everyone. It is not going to happen if pressure is put on Pakistan to change its relationship or downgrade its relationship with China, it wouldn’t happen," Imran said.

Emphasising the deep relationship with China, Imran said that Pakistan would never bend under any kind of pressure. "Whatever will happen, our relationship between the two countries, no matter what pressure is put on us, is not going to change," he said.

He said that there was a "strange, great rivalry" taking place in the region which was public knowledge.

"You see the United States being wary of China. The way United States and China are looking at each other creates problems because what the United States is doing is it''s formed this regional alliance called the Quad, which is US, India and a couple of other countries," Imran said.

The Quad or Quadrilateral alliance consisting of the US, India, Japan and Australia has been resolving to uphold a rules-based international order in the Indo-Pacific amid growing Chinese assertiveness in the region.

Responding to a question about how to further deepen Sino-Pakistan ties, Imran said that the two sides enjoyed strong political ties but the relationship was not only limited to official relations but it was also "people to people relationship".

He said trade was important to increase ties in future and termed the $60 billion China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) as the "biggest thing happening in Pakistan".

The CPEC, which connects Gwadar Port in Pakistan's Balochistan with China's Xinjiang province, is the flagship project of China's ambitious multi-billion-dollar Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).

Highlighting the 70 years of diplomatic ties, Imran said China always stood with Pakistan, which "always had a very special relationship with China".

He said that China "always stood with us" whenever Pakistan was in trouble politically or internationally or in a conflict with its neighbour, in an apparent reference to India.

"In good times, everyone stands with you but in your difficult, tough times, bad times, you remember those people who stood by you. That's why you will find that in Pakistan, people always have a special fondness for people in China," he said.



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3jtTvWs

World Asteroid Day 2021: History, significance, all you need to know

World Asteroid Day is observed on 30 June every year around the world. The day is celebrated to raise awareness about the harmful effects of asteroids on Earth and the measures that should be taken about the risks and impacts.

This special day was designated by the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) as the anniversary of the Tunguska impact over Siberia. For the unversed, Tunguska is the largest asteroid so far that had an impact on the earth.

Every year on this day, events are conducted by independent Asteroid Day Event Organizers around the world. The mission behind organising events on World Asteroid Day is to inspire, engage and educate people about the opportunities and risks related to asteroids.

What is an Asteroid?

They are small objects made out of rocks that revolve around the Sun. These Asteroids are mostly leftover material of the Solar System that are found between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter. The measurement of an Asteroid ranges from the size of a pebble to around 600 miles across. As per experts, there are nearly several hundred thousand asteroids that exist in our Solar System.

History of World Asteroid Day

The United Nations General Assembly adopted a resolution A/RES/71/90 and declared 30 June as World Asteroid Day in December 2016. The decision was made on the proposal of the Association of Space Explorers and the Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS).

Several space agencies across the world on this day including ESA (European Space Agency), JAXA (Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency), Roscosmos (Russia), ISRO (India), and NASA (USA) organize events to educate people about the impact of asteroids and meteors especially entering the Earth's atmosphere.

Significance of World Asteroid Day

A foundation named B612 works towards protecting the Earth from asteroid impacts and informing the world about decision-making on planetary defence issues. This foundation provides a voice on the risks and implications of asteroid data while advancing the technical means. B612 serves as an informed source of policymakers and scientists who can best help to achieve these goals.



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3juyP0O

Consulate warns Indians face serious threat of kidnapping in Afghanistan: All you need to know

The Indian embassy in Afghanistan on Tuesday advised all Indians visiting, staying and working in Afghanistan to exercise utmost caution with regard to their security and avoid all types of non-essential travel in view of escalating violence in various parts of the country.

According to official data, over 3,000 Indians are staying in Afghanistan currently.

A majority of Indian nationals in Afghanistan are engineers and staff working on hundreds of development projects being implemented across the country. India is the largest regional donor in Afghanistan, with pledges of around $3 billion.

What's the threat

In a 13-point advisory, the embassy strongly cautioned against the threat of abduction, death and injury in terrorist attacks in Afghanistan, which is considered the most dangerous place in the world.

"The security situation in Afghanistan remains dangerous in several provinces. Terror groups operating in Afghanistan have escalated violent activities and carried out a series of complex attacks in various parts of Afghanistan, including targeting Afghan defence and security forces and Afghan government institutions and even civilians," the embassy said.

"Indian nationals are not exceptions, and they additionally face a serious threat of kidnapping," it said.

  • The embassy said the security situation in Afghanistan remains "dangerous" and that terror groups have carried out a series of complex attacks, including targeting civilians.
  • The embassy also warned that Indian nationals additionally face a "serious threat" of abduction.
  • In addition to this, Taliban had also issued a threat to journalists working or reporting from Afghanistan, who they perceive as siding with the West and Afghanistan's government.

What has Indian Embassy advised its nationals?

  • The embassy "strongly advised" all Indians to avoid all types of non-essential movements
  • The embassy advised people to avoid movement during peak commuting hours.
  • Venturing out of main cities should be avoided, it said, adding that essential travel should be undertaken by air as many highways and roads are unsafe and prone to attacks.
  • It urged them to keep essential movements as discrete as possible and avoid following predictable routes or routines
  • The embassy also strongly advised the Indian companies operating in Afghanistan to take up necessary security measures for their Indian employees deployed at project sites.
  • While travelling on roads, it advised Indians to maintain distance from possible targets like military convoys, vehicles of government ministries/offices, high-ranking officials, law-enforcement agencies, and to avoid visiting crowded markets
  • All Indian nationals arriving in Afghanistan were also advised to register with the Embassy/Consulates on the website: https://eoi.gov.in/kabul/ or by email to paw.kabul@mea.gov.in. Those who are already present but have not registered or updated their contact details are also requested to do so immediately.

The backdrop

Afghanistan had been in a state of almost constant war for over 20 years even before the US got involved.

In 1979, a year after a military coup, the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan to support a friendly government. It fought a resistance movement - known as the mujahideen - that was supported by the US, Pakistan, China and Saudi Arabia, among other countries. In 1989, Soviet troops withdrew but the civil war continued. In the chaos that followed, the Taliban (which means "students" in the Pashto language) sprang up.

They ruled the country since 1996, the West living in oblivion to the harsh Sharia rule implemented by them that included beheadings and public executions. But after the 11 September attacks in America killed nearly 3,000 people, US invaded Afghanistan as the Taliban supported and protected Al Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden, the main perpetrator behind the US bombings.

After the US attack, the Taliban rule was quickly dismantled and its fighters and warlords quickly melted away across the porous Pakistan border but they didn't totally disappear.

What's happening there now?

  • In recent days, the Taliban have made quick gains in Afghanistan’s north, overrunning multiple districts, some of them reportedly with hardly a fight, even as the US and NATO press forward with their final withdrawal from Afghanistan. By all accounts, their departure will be complete long before the 11 September deadline set by President Joe Biden when he announced in mid-April an end to America’s “forever war.”
  • The Taliban gains are significant because:
  • A) The transportation routes they provide the insurgents. With the recent gains, Taliban now control the main border crossing with Tajikistan, the main trade route. They also hold the strategic district of Doshi, critical because the one road linking Kabul to northern Afghanistan runs through it.
  • B) Equally significant is that the north is the traditional stronghold of Afghanistan’s minority ethnic groups, who aided the US-led invasion that drove the Taliban from power nearly 20 years ago and have been part of the ruling leadership since. The traditional stronghold of the Taliban, who are mostly ethnic Pashtuns, has been in the country’s south and east.

As a result, a worried government this week launched what it called National Mobilisation, arming local volunteers. Observers say the move only resurrects militias that will be loyal to local commanders or powerful Kabul-allied warlords, who wrecked the Afghan capital during the inter-factional fighting of the 1990s and killed thousands of civilians.

"The fact that the government has put out the call for the militias is a clear admission of the failure of the security forces... most certainly an act of desperation," said Bill Roggio, senior fellow at the US-based Foundation for Defense of Democracies. Roggio tracks militant groups and is editor of the foundation’s Long War Journal.

“The Afghan military and police have abandoned numerous outposts, bases, and district centers, and it is difficult to imagine that these hastily organized militias can perform better than organized security forces,” he said.

Meanwhile, as the districts fell, Afghan President Ashraf Ghani swept through his Defense and Interior Ministries, appointing new senior leadership, including reinstating Bismillah Khan as defence minister. Khan was previously removed for corruption, and his militias have been criticized for summary killings. They were also deeply involved in the brutal civil war that led to the Taliban’s takeover in 1996.

Afghan and international observers fear a similar conflict could erupt once more. During the 1990’s war, multiple warlords battled for power, nearly destroying Kabul and killing at least 50,000 people — mostly civilians — in the process.

Those warlords returned to power after the Taliban’s fall and have gained wealth and strength since. They are jealous of their domains, deeply distrustful of each other, and their loyalties to Ghani are fluid. Ethnic Uzbek warlord Rashid Dostum Uzbek, for example, violently ousted the president’s choice for governor of his Uzbek-controlled province of Faryab earlier this year.

A former adviser to the Afghan government, Torek Farhadi, called the national mobilization “a recipe for future generalized violence.”

He noted the government has promised to pay the militias, even as official security forces complain salaries are often delayed for months. He predicted the same corruption would eat away at the funds meant for militias, and as a result “local commanders and warlords will quickly turn against him (Ghani) and we will have fiefdoms and chaos."

With inputs from The Associated Press



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3jqYmYH

Tuesday, June 29, 2021

Scores dead as record-breaking heat wave grips Canada, northwestern US

Vancouver: Scores of deaths in Canada's Vancouver area are likely linked to a grueling heat wave, authorities said Tuesday, as the country recorded its highest ever temperature amid scorching conditions that extended to the US Pacific Northwest.

At least 134 people have died suddenly since Friday in the Vancouver area, according to figures released by the city police department and the Royal Canadian Mounted police.

The Vancouver Police Department alone said it had responded to more than 65 sudden deaths since Friday, with the vast majority "related to the heat."

The deaths came as Canada set a new all-time high temperature record for a third day in a row Tuesday, reaching 121 degrees Fahrenheit (49.5 degrees Celsius) in Lytton, British Columbia, about 155 miles (250 kilometers) east of Vancouver, the country's weather service, Environment Canada, reported.

"Vancouver has never experienced heat like this, and sadly dozens of people are dying because of it," police sergeant Steve Addison said.

Other local municipalities have said they too have responded to many sudden death calls, but have yet to release tolls.

Climate change is causing record-setting temperatures to become more frequent. Globally, the decade to 2019 was the hottest recorded, and the five hottest years have all occurred within the last five years.

The scorching heat stretching from the US state of Oregon to Canada's Arctic territories has been blamed on a high-pressure ridge trapping warm air in the region.

Temperatures in the US Pacific Northwest cities of Portland, Oregon and Seattle, Washington reached levels not seen since record-keeping began in the 1940s: 115 degrees Fahrenheit in Portland and 108 in Seattle Monday, according to the National Weather Service.

Vancouver on the Pacific coast has for several days recorded temperatures above 86 degrees Fahrenheit (or almost 20 degrees above seasonal norms). Inland along the Fraser River delta, due to high humidity, climatologists said it felt like 111 degrees Fahrenheit on Tuesday.

The chief coroner for the province of British Columbia, which includes Vancouver, said that it had "experienced a significant increase in deaths reported where it is suspected that extreme heat has been contributory."

The service said in a statement it recorded 233 deaths between Friday and Monday, compared to 130 on average.

'Hottest week ever'

"We are in the midst of the hottest week British Columbians have ever experienced, and there are consequences to that, disastrous consequences for families and for communities," British Columbia Premier John Horgan told a news conference.

"How we get through this extraordinary time is by hanging together," he said.

He urged "checking up on those people we know might be at risk, making sure we have cold compresses in the fridge or we're staying in the coolest part of our homes, and making sure that we're taking steps to get through this heat wave."

Environment Canada has issued alerts for British Columbia, Alberta, and parts of Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Yukon and the Northwest Territories, saying the "prolonged, dangerous and historic heat wave will persist through this week."

The US National Weather Service issued a similar warning, urging people to "stay in air-conditioned buildings, avoid strenuous outdoor activities, drink plenty of water, and check on family members/neighbors."

The heat wave has forced schools and Covid-19 vaccination centers to close in the Vancouver area, while officials set up temporary water fountains and misting stations on street corners.

Stores quickly sold out of portable air conditioners and fans, so several people without cooling at home told AFP they hunkered down in their air conditioned cars or underground parking garages at night.

Cities across the western United States and Canada opened emergency cooling centers and outreach workers handed out bottles of water and hats.

In Eugene in Oregon, organisers were forced to adjust the final day of the US Olympic track and field trials, moving afternoon events to the evening.

The extreme heat, combined with intense drought, also created the perfect conditions for several fires to break out over the weekend, and one blaze on the California-Oregon border had already burned some 1,500 acres (600 hectares) by Monday morning.

"Dubai would be cooler than what we're seeing now," David Phillips, a senior climatologist for Environment Canada, told AFP on Monday.



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3hqjHyW

Kim Jong-un berates top officials for ‘great crisis’ in North Korea, failure to prevent COVID-19

Seoul: North Korean leader Kim Jong-un berated top officials for failures in coronavirus prevention that caused a “great crisis,” using strong language that raised the specter of a mass outbreak in a country that would be scarcely able to handle it.

The state media report Wednesday did not specify what “crucial” lapse had prompted Kim to call the Politburo meeting of the ruling Workers’ Party, but experts said the North could be wrestling with a significant setback in its pandemic fight.

So far, North Korea has claimed to have had no coronavirus infections, despite testing thousands of people and sharing a porous border with China. Experts widely doubt the claim and are concerned about any potential outbreak, given the country's poor health infrastructure.

At the Politburo meeting, Kim criticised the senior officials for supposed incompetence, irresponsibility and passiveness in planning and executing anti-virus measures amid the lengthening pandemic, the North’s official Korean Central News Agency said.

Kim said “senior officials in charge of important state affairs neglected the implementation of the important decisions of the party on taking organisational, institutional, material, scientific and technological measures as required by the prolonged state emergency epidemic prevention campaign,” according to the KCNA. This “caused a crucial case of creating a great crisis in ensuring the security of the state and safety of the people and entailed grave consequences.”

The report also said the party recalled an unspecified member of the Politburo’s powerful presidium, which consists of Kim and four other top officials.

The reference indicated Kim may replace his Cabinet Premier Kim Tok Hun, who would be held responsible for failures in the government’s anti-epidemic work, said Hong Min, a senior analyst at Seoul’s Korea Institute for National Unification.

“There is no possibility that North Korea will ever admit to an infection — even if there were mass transmissions, the North will definitely not reveal such developments and will continue to push forward an anti-virus campaign it has claimed to be the greatest,” Hong said.

“But it’s also clear that something significant happened and it was big enough to warrant a reprimanding of senior officials. This could mean mass infections or some sort of situation where a lot of people were put at direct risk of infections.”

From the start of the pandemic, North Korea described its anti-virus efforts as a “matter of national existence,” banned tourists, jetted out diplomats and severely curtailed cross-border traffic and trade. The lockdown has further strained an economy already battered by decades of mismanagement and crippling US-led sanctions over the country’s nuclear weapons program.

Kim Jong-un during a political conference earlier this month called for officials to brace for prolonged COVID-19 restrictions, indicating that the country isn’t ready to open its borders anytime soon despite its economic woes.

North Korea has told the World Health Organisation it has not found a single coronavirus infection after testing more than 30,000 people, including many described as having fevers or respiratory symptoms.

The North’s extended border controls come amid uncertainties over the country’s vaccination prospects. COVAX, the UN-backed program to ship COVID-19 vaccines worldwide, said in February that the North could receive 1.9 million doses in the first half of the year, but the plans have been delayed due to global shortages.



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3w0FGBC

Brazil to suspend Covaxin deal, probe launched into corruption allegations against Jair Bolsonaro

Brasilia: Accusations that Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro turned a blind eye to possible corruption in a deal to purchase coronavirus vaccines have heightened threats to his presidency, including a move to recommend slapping him with a criminal charge.

The claims have added impetus to the opposition's impeachment drive and left the Brazilian leader's allies in Congress evaluating the costs of their support.

Bolsonaro, who has been targeted by nationwide street protests in recent weeks, has called the Senate committee investigating the government’s COVID-19 response a “national shame” aimed at undermining his administration. For two months, the nationally televised hearings have largely focused on why his Health Ministry ignored opportunities to buy vaccines while Bolsonaro relentlessly pushed hydroxychloroquine, the malaria drug that rigorous studies have shown to be ineffective in treating COVID-19.

Testimony before the Senate committee last week from Luis Ricardo Miranda, the chief of the Health Ministry’s import division, and his brother Luis Miranda, a lawmaker until recently allied with Bolsonaro, has turned up the heat even more.

The Health Ministry official said he faced pressure to greenlight the import of Indian pharmaceutical Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin vaccine and that there were irregularities in the invoices — particularly a $45 million upfront payment to a Singapore-based company.

In March, the brothers brought their concerns to Bolsonaro, who they said promised to send the case to the Federal Police and mentioned the government's leader in Congress's lower house, a top Bolsonaro ally, as being involved.

However, the Federal Police never received any request to investigate, neither from Bolsonaro nor his Health Ministry, according to a Federal Police source with knowledge of investigations who wasn’t authorised to speak publicly and declined to be named.

The secretary-general of the presidency, Onyx Lorenzoni, told reporters last week that Bolsonaro did meet with the Mirandas but claimed they presented fraudulent documents. Bolsonaro ordered the brothers investigated, he said.

Bharat Biotech has denied any allegation of wrongdoing with respect to vaccine supply, saying in an emailed statement that it adheres to the highest standards of compliance. The company’s press representative didn’t respond when asked why a payment would be routed through a Singapore-based company.

The case has galvanised Bolsonaro’s opponents and prompted protest organisers to move up their next nationwide demonstration to Saturday. The percentage of people rating Bolsonaro’s government bad or terrible has reached an all-time high, according to pollster Datafolha.

Seven of the 11 members of the Senate committee investigating Bolsonaro's COVID-19 response told The Associated Press that, once their inquest concludes, in August at earliest, they will vote to approve recommending Bolsonaro be indicted on the charge of prevarication. The crime entails delaying or refraining from action required as part of a public official’s duty for reasons of personal interest.

Sen. Randolfe Rodrigues and Sen. Humberto Costa spoke on record with AP. Five senators spoke on condition of anonymity due to concerns that detailing plans will expose the committee to attacks from the government and its allies.

Bolsonaro on Saturday said the committee has “seven scoundrels” among its members. He has denied all wrongdoing and knowledge of possible corruption.

Any committee recommendation for indictment would need to be accepted by the prosecutor-general, a Bolsonaro appointee, then approved by Congress before an investigation could begin.

The committee is “a big threat to Bolsonaro, but one step at a time,” said Thiago de Aragão, director of strategy at political risk consultancy Arko Advice, who added the accusations have increased the pressure.

“But it’s only a gamechanger if you have an important portion of congressmen, shifting sides and endorsing this kind of action against him.”

Last year, Bolsonaro began drawing close to the large “Centrao” bloc in Congress to shore up his legislative agenda and stave off risks of impeachment. In the wake of the allegations against Bolsonaro, its lawmakers have begun reevaluating the risks of backing him, according to Cláudio Couto, a political scientist at the Getulio Vargas Foundation, a university.

“It’s still in their interest to follow the government at this moment,” Couto said. But, he added, “Defending a president who is very compromised is difficult for anyone. Politicians and parties won’t want to associate their image with a president like that. There’s a limit to everything.”

The opposition has filed more than 100 impeachment requests, but House Speaker Arthur Lira, a Centrao member, reiterated in an interview Friday with local media Jota that there aren't sufficient reasons for him to greenlight proceedings.

The Miranda brothers' Senate committee testimony “fundamentally changes the debate, because at that moment the president had the duty to take some sort of measure" or explain why their claims were baseless, said Davi Tangerino, a professor of criminal law at the Getulio Vargas Foundation.

The Health Ministry signed a contract for 20 million Covaxin doses in February. However, the government hadn't yet made any payments nor were any vaccines provided due to obstacles in the health regulator’s approval process.

On Tuesday, the health ministry announced that the government is “temporarily suspending” the Covaxin contract. Comptroller-general Wagner Rosário said his office will evaluate the process by which it was signed.

Even before the Miranda brothers' testimony last week, federal prosecutors were already investigating possible irregularities in the contract, which committed the Health Ministry to pay $320 million — at a cost of $15 per vaccine dose, the most expensive of all vaccines Brazil purchased — to Bharat Biotech’s representative in Brazil, according to a document sent to the AP by the prosecutor-general’s press office.

The political dust has yet to settle, but the case is a sign that Bolsonaro will face additional headwinds with his reelection bid next year.

“The extent of the political damage remains uncertain,” newspaper O Globo wrote in an editorial published Tuesday. “Concretely, the only thing one can say is the government is cornered and ever more hostage to allies.”



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3h5cnK7

Renovated Harry Truman museum and library in Missouri set to reopen in July with COVID-19 restrictions

Independence, Missouri: After nearly two years of renovations complicated by COVID-19 restrictions, the Harry S Truman Presidential Library and Museum is ready to welcome visitors back with an updated focus on how Truman’s legacy resonates today.

The museum opens to the public on 2 July, with hours and visitor numbers initially restricted because of pandemic regulations.

Visitors will find a museum completely reimagined during its most extensive renovation since it opened in 1957 in Truman’s hometown of Independence, Missouri, an eastern suburb of Kansas City. The nearly $30 million project includes a sparkling new entrance; many more artefacts, photographs, videos and films; and exhibits that encourage visitors to touch and interact with displays.

One solemn gallery showcases Truman’s first four months in office, some of the most consequential months in US history. Germany surrendered, the US dropped nuclear bombs on Japan to end World War II, and world leaders at the Potsdam conference determined the makeup of the postwar world.

Nearly everyone knows Truman dropped the bombs, but his legacy was formed in the next 7 1/2 years of his presidency, when he set out to win the peace and put the world back together, said Museum Director Kurt Graham.

“If you focus only on the bomb, you miss the heart of his legacy. My job isn’t to say he got everything right, but I think it’s important for people, especially young people, to realise that Harry Truman had more influence on the world they have inherited than most other US presidents,” he said.

Graham said the museum, which closed in July 2019 for the renovations, was demolished “down to the bare studs.” People who remember the old building will recognise little except a Thomas Hart Benton mural, some artefacts and a recreation of Truman’s Oval Office, he said.

After starting in the new 3,000-square-foot Grandview Hall entrance, visitors first see Truman giving a speech in 1945 when he was running as Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s vice president. FDR died only 82 days into that term, leaving the world wondering, “who is this farmer from Missouri who is taking over the free world?” Graham said.

The exhibits try to answer that question. The first gallery shows Truman’s life in Missouri before he entered politics, from his childhood on a farm to his service in World War I to his failed haberdashery and his connection to Kansas City political machine boss Thomas Pendergast.

The previous museum had showcased Truman’s political life and presidency and relegated his personal life in Missouri to the basement. Now, his story is told in a more linear way.

“Now you can truly weave through his boyhood into the presidency and beyond,” said Kelly Anders, deputy director of the museum.

The centrepiece of the gallery about Truman’s first months in office shows a safety plug from the bomb that was dropped on Nagasaki. Nearby is a display about the more than 1,000 origami cranes symbolising peace that were created by Sadako Sasaki, a Japanese girl who died at age 12 from radiation poisoning. Her brother donated to the museum what is believed to be one of the last cranes she folded.

Those types of artefacts illuminate why Truman is one of the most significant presidents in US history, said AJ Baime, author of several non-fiction books, including Dewey Defeats Truman and The Accidental President.

“That’s why presidential libraries are so important,” said Baime, who did research at the library and toured it during renovations. “Many people are not going to crack open a 300-page book, but seeing those artefacts makes history come alive.”

The galleries highlight challenges such as the Red Scare, over the perceived Communist threat in the US during the Cold War; Truman’s firing of General Douglas MacArthur after disagreements about the Korean War; desegregating the military and promoting civil rights; and recognising the state of Israel.

Other displays include a beam from the White House before it was extensively updated during Truman’s tenure, some humorous gifts he received, and the famous 'The Buck Stops Here' sign he kept on his desk in the Oval Office.

Because of the controversial decisions he made, Truman left the presidency in 1953 with a 32 percent approval rating, the lowest for a president in US history.

In subsequent decades, however, the public and politicians from both major parties have come to appreciate Truman’s legacy and often cite his example. Former President Lyndon Johnson and other prominent politicians have visited the museum to sign legislation. The museum showcases praise from current leaders with vastly different beliefs to highlight Truman’s continuing relevance, Graham said.

As visitors head to the exit, they can stop in a courtyard where Truman, wife Bess, their daughter and son-in-law are buried.

Most of the museum makeover was paid for through private funding, and another $7 million was raised for endowments and programming.

Baime said he initially was skeptical that a museum renovation was needed, but the result won him over. He calls it “an experience that can really open people’s eyes, minds and hearts. There will be people walking through who remember those events, and kids walking through who are going to see things to really inspire them to understand how our country came to be what it is.”



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/365ofoM

Swiss govt says fully vaccinated persons from India can enter country without COVID-19 test or quarantine

Zurich: As Switzerland relaxed COVID-related restrictions from 26 June, the government's Federal Council of Public Health has informed that persons from countries with a variant of concern like India, who have been vaccinated or who have recovered from COVID-19, will be permitted entry without the need for a negative test or quarantine.

However, for those people who are arriving from a country with a variant of the virus of concern, they will be permitted entry as long as it is certain that the vaccination offers good protection. Those who have neither been vaccinated nor have recovered must present a negative PCR test or rapid antigen test and go into quarantine on entry, said the Federal Council.

This means that persons who have been vaccinated or who have recovered do not have to produce a negative test even when travelling from countries where the Delta variant is widespread (such as India or the United Kingdom) and do not have to quarantine on entry.

"The vaccines used in Switzerland are only slightly less effective against the Delta variant and thus still offer a very high level of protection," said the Council.

The Swiss government has also announced that COVID-19 certificates will be permitted as supporting documents in case of international travel and areas of application in the country.

In an FAQ, Switzerland's Federal Council of Public Health said that: "From 1 July, the federal government works on the assumption that anyone who wants a COVID-19 certificate will have received one. From this date, only COVID certificates will be permitted as supporting documents for the areas of application in Switzerland. This applies to cases set out in the COVID-19 Special Situation Ordinance, so e.g. events, cinemas, theatres and restaurants if they wish to restrict entry to those who are vaccinated, have tested negative or recovered."

"In international travel and in the context of contact quarantine, alternative supporting documents are still possible," it added. Additionally, children can also be issued with a COVID-19 certificate of testing or recovery and the certificates of all family members can be stored in a single app, according to the Council.

A COVID-19 certificate allows people to resume certain activities and serves as evidence that an individual is either protected against the virus or it is highly unlikely that he/she is infectious.

According to the Federal Council's line of action, everyday settings, such as public transport, retail, workplaces and training facilities, are where the use of the COVID-19 certificate is not planned in the ordinance.

Settings, where the certificate will be a condition, include international passenger transport, major events and nightclubs for dance events.

On 23 June, the Federal Council had decided to relax the requirements for entering Switzerland from Saturday after a decrease in fresh infections. Persons entering from the Schengen area will no longer be required to quarantine. It is now once again possible for third-country citizens travelling from countries such as the USA, Albania or Serbia to enter Switzerland, informed the Council.

Meanwhile, in Switzerland, the requirements to work from home and to wear masks outdoors will be lifted and restaurants will again be allowed to seat as many people together as they wish. Large-scale events with COVID-19 certificates will be allowed to take place without restrictions on capacity or the number of people present.

"Case numbers and hospital admissions due to COVID-19 are continuing to fall sharply. In addition, around half of the adult population will be fully vaccinated by the end of the month. However, caution is still warranted," said the Federal Council.

Shops, leisure and sporting facilities will be able to make full use of their available capacity. Water parks may also reopen. However, a restriction of two-thirds' capacity will apply to events and venues where no COVID-19 certificate is required.

The rules for events without a COVID-19 certificate requirement include that up to 1,000 people may attend an event indoors or outdoors and up to two-thirds of the venue's capacity may be used.

The limits regarding private events continue to apply, that is, no more than 30 people allowed indoors and 50 people for outdoors.



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3AaArm2

Pakistan will pay 'very heavy price' if it continues to support Taliban, warns Afghanistan's Amurullah Saleh

Kabul: Afghanistan's first vice-president Amurullah Saleh has warned Pakistan that if it continues to provide support to Taliban then it has to pay a "very high price", local media reported.

"Pakistan-as a host of the Taliban since group's foundation could play a significant role in the peace process, and therefore become a reliable partner of the Afghan nation," Saleh said in a statement on Sunday as reported by Afghanistan Times.

According to a recent UN report, at least a dozen different militant groups are now active in both Pakistan and Afghanistan, with at least 6,500 Pakistani nationals reportedly involved.

This comes in the middle of a surge of violence in Afghanistan with frequent clashes between the Taliban and Afghan security forces amid US troop withdrawal.

According to the UN report, Pakistan-based jihadi groups such as Jaish-i-Mohammed (JeM) and Lashkar-e-Tayyiba (LeT) continue to fight alongside Taliban groups against Afghan national forces.

The Afghan vice-president said the price of supporting Taliban will be very high and that the situation has changed "not only us but the voices of conscience in Pakistan parliament strongly condemn the killings of Afghans at the hands of the Taliban" the daily reported.

Saleh belives all the countries except Pakistan wants to have good relations with the country, Afghanistan Times reported. Pakistan's interior minister Sheikh Rashid Ahmed on Sunday admitted that families of Afghan Taliban reside in his country, including in the capital city of Islamabad and that sometimes the members of the militant outfit are treated in local hospitals.

"Taliban families live here, in Pakistan, in Rawat, Loi Ber, Bara Kahuh and Tarnol," Rashid told a Urdu-language network in Pakistan citing the names of Islamabad suburbs. "Sometimes their bodies arrive and sometimes they come here in hospitals to get medical treatment," he said.

Islamabad has been accused of aiding the Taliban and using them as proxies for its own benefit. However, it continues to deny its connection to the terrorist group despite mounting evidence. John Bolton, the former White House National Security Advisor also accused Pakistan for providing support to Taliban from last two decades, The Khaama Press reported.

"If the Taliban seizes the power in Afghanistan, it will also be a threat to Pakistan as the extremist pressure on the Pakistani government will increase", Bolton warned Pakistan.

The Afghan vice-president said the recent trip to Washington by an Afghanistan was highly productive. Afghanistan president Ashraf Ghani, along with the first vice president Amrullah Saleh, Hamdullah Mohib (National Security Advisor) Mohammad Hanif Atmar (Minister of Foreign Affairs) Adela Raz (Afghan Representative in UN) Shahrzad Akbar (Human Rights Commission Head) and the two female members of Afghanistan negotiating team Fatima Gailani and Habiba Sarabi joined the delegation meet, as reported by The Khaama Press.



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3jmHqT6

Multiple cyclinder blasts at Barkat Market in Pakistan's Lahore; one injured, several shops damaged

Lahore: Multiple cylinder blasts took place on Tuesday at Lahore's Barkat Market, days after a terror attack in the city killed three people, ARY News reported.

According to rescue sources, the gas cylinders blew up one by one at the market, making it difficult for anyone to go near the spot. "So far 10 cylinders have exploded," they said, adding that at least one person has sustained burn wounds in the incident.

At least 12 vehicles and multiple shops have been damaged in the incident as per initial assessment as nearby shops in the Barkat Market have been vacated over fears of further damage.

The rescue, police, and district administration have cordoned off the surrounding area and efforts are underway to douse the fire, reported ARY News.

Cylinder blasts are being reported frequently in the country, mainly owing to the use of substandard products.

Last week, a powerful blast in the Pakistani city's Johar Town near criminal mastermind Hafiz Saeed's home killed three people and injured 24 others, including a police constable.

Following the blast, a car mechanic was taken into custody on Saturday for his involvement in the blast. Sources said intelligence agencies arrested the technician for modifying the interiors of the car that was used in the blast. "He has been shifted to an unknown location," Geo News quoted a source as saying.

A rickshaw and motorcycles parked nearby were completely destroyed by the blast, the police said. The site of the blast was cordoned off with a bomb disposal squad collecting evidence.

Hafiz Saeed's residence remained safe, but many other houses and shops falling within a 100 square feet radius of the blast site were damaged.



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3h1ra8w

Over 10 million Australians in lockdown as country battles Delta variant flare-ups; Brisbane issues stay-at-home orders

Brisbane: More than 10 million Australians have been ordered into lockdown as coronavirus cases spread across the country, and Brisbane on Tuesday became the fourth major city to issue stay-at-home orders.

The three-day snap lockdown for Brisbane, starting on Tuesday evening, comes on top of similar measures imposed in Sydney, Perth and Darwin in recent days.

"These are tough decisions," Queensland state Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk said, after Australia recorded 23 virus cases in 24 hours. "We are having lockdowns in major cities because the overseas arrivals are bringing the virus here."

Australia has been broadly successful in eliminating local transmission through a mix of border closures, mandatory hotel quarantine for overseas arrivals and snap lockdowns.

But it is now battling flare-ups of the highly contagious Delta variant — which first emerged in India — as public anger grows at the slow pace of vaccinations.

Less than five percent of adults are believed to have received both vaccine doses.

Brisbane resident Nicola Hungerford, 57, said she expected lockdowns to keep happening "until the government gets their bloody act together" on the vaccine rollout. "It's gobsmacking and they're just irresponsible. It shows how little respect they have for people," she told AFP.

As well as Brisbane, surrounding coastal regions and the small northern city of Townsville are also subject to the latest order, after an unvaccinated hospital worker spent up to 10 days travelling around Queensland while infectious.

On Tuesday morning, Perth residents woke to a four-day snap lockdown after a local cluster grew to three cases.

Shubh Singh, manager of Punjab Sweets & Curry House, backed the decision even though he expected his Perth business to lose about 50 percent of revenue during the shutdown.

"But the measures are necessary to ensure it doesn't linger for months, because a lengthy lockdown would be disastrous," he told AFP. "It is eerie though seeing these streets so quiet."

Cluster concern 
The largest outbreak is in Sydney, where 150 people have tested positive for COVID-19 since mid-June, with the city's residents now under stay-at-home orders for two weeks.

A small cluster linked to an outback gold mine sent Darwin into lockdown after exposure sites were found for the first time in the northern city, which is home to a large Indigenous population feared to be more vulnerable to COVID-19.

The announcements come during school holidays for large parts of the country and are expected to cause a wave of travel cancellations, with unaffected states warning people not to visit impacted areas.

New Zealand said on Tuesday it would partially reopen its travel bubble with Australia from 5 July, but only with states that have not recorded any cases.

Under pressure over his government's response, Prime Minister Scott Morrison announced vaccines will become mandatory for aged care and quarantine hotel workers, while the AstraZeneca jab will be available to people aged under 60 who sign an indemnity form.

Morrison's newly appointed deputy prime minister Barnaby Joyce, meanwhile, was fined Australian $200 (US$150) after a member of the public reported him for not wearing a mask.

In all locked-down areas, people are generally required to stay at home except for essential work, exercise, to buy groceries or for medical reasons. Masks are mandatory across swathes of the country.

Australia has recorded a total of just over 30,000 cases and 910 deaths in a population of about 25 million since the pandemic began.

 



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3x8QH5d

Explainer: As critical race theory divides US schools, decoding the concept, and why some find it 'objectionable'

Former President Donald Trump has railed against it. Republicans in the US Senate introduced a resolution condemning any requirement for teachers to be trained in it. And several Republican-controlled states have invoked it in legislation restricting how race can be taught in public schools.

The concept known as critical race theory is the new lightning rod of the GOP. But what exactly is it?

The term seemed to appear in statehouses and at political rallies almost from nowhere. Over the past few months, it has morphed from an obscure academic discussion point on the left into a political rallying cry on the right.

On Wednesday, for instance, critical race theory became a flashpoint during a congressional hearing into the military’s approach to addressing racism and extremism, when Gen Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, pushed back forcefully against accusations by Republican lawmakers that the effort is creating division and hurting morale.

Yet, even those who condemn or seek to ban critical race theory in schools often struggle to define what it is. Real-world examples of students being indoctrinated in its principles are difficult to find.

What is critical race theory?

Critical race theory is a way of thinking about America’s history through the lens of racism. Scholars developed it during the 1970s and 1980s in response to what they viewed as a lack of racial progress following the civil rights legislation of the 1960s.

It centers on the idea that racism is systemic in the nation’s institutions and that they function to maintain the dominance of white people in society.

The architects of the theory argue that the United States was founded on the theft of land and labor and that federal law has preserved the unequal treatment of people on the basis of race. Proponents also believe race is culturally invented, not biological.

Kimberlé Crenshaw, executive director of the African American Policy Forum, a social justice think tank based in New York City, was one of the early proponents. Initially, she says, it was "simply about telling a more complete story of who we are".

Is critical race theory being taught in schools?

There is little to no evidence that critical race theory itself is being taught to K-12 public school students, though some ideas central to it, such as lingering consequences of slavery, have been. In Greenwich, Connecticut, some middle school students were given a “white bias” survey that parents viewed as part of the theory.

Republicans in North Carolina point to the Wake County Public School System as an example, saying teachers participated in a professional development session on critical race theory. County education officials canceled a future study session once it was discovered but insist the theory is not part of its classroom curriculum.

“Critical race theory is not something we teach to students,” said Lisa Luten, a spokeswoman for the school system. “It’s more of a theory in academia about race that adults use to discuss the context of their environment.”

Why are Republicans upset?

Many Republicans view the concepts underlying critical race theory as an effort to rewrite American history and persuade white people that they are inherently racist and should feel guilty because of their advantages.

But the theory also has become somewhat of a catchall phrase to describe racial concepts some conservatives find objectionable, such as white privilege, systemic inequality and inherent bias.

Where did Republican pushback begin?

Republicans often cite the 1619 Project as a cause for concern. The New York Times initiative, published in 2019, aimed to tell a fuller story of the country’s history by putting slavery at the center of America’s founding.

Critical race theory popped into the mainstream last September when then-President Trump took aim at it and the 1619 Project as part of a White House event focused on the nation’s history. He called both “a crusade against American history” and “ideological poison that...will destroy our country".

How are states addressing it?

So far, 25 states have considered legislation or other steps to limit how race and racism can be taught, according to an analysis from Education Week. Eight states, all Republican-led, have banned or limited the teaching of critical race theory or similar concepts through laws or administrative actions. The bans largely address what can be taught inside the classroom. While bills in some states mention critical race theory by name, others do not.

Last week Texas Gov Greg Abbott signed a bill prohibiting public school teachers from making any of 10 concepts part of their curriculum. That includes the idea that the advent of slavery in what is now the United States marks the true founding of the nation.

At the request of Florida Gov Ron DeSantis, that state’s education board approved a resolution last week stating that teaching critical race theory and using instructional material related to the 1619 Project violate state standards. US Sen Rick Scott, R-Florida, and two other GOP senators introduced a resolution last month that “condemns the practice of requiring teachers to receive Critical Race Theory education".

What is the response to the GOP actions?

Teachers’ unions, educators and social studies organisations worry the limits will whitewash American history by downplaying the role past injustices still play today. They also fear a chilling effect on classroom discussions.

Leading critical race theory scholars view the GOP-led measures as hijacking the national conversation about racial inequality that gained momentum after the killing of George Floyd by a white police officer in Minnesota.

Some say the ways Republicans describe it are unrecognisable to them. Cheryl Harris, a UCLA law professor who teaches a course on the topic, said it’s a myth that critical race theory teaches hatred of white people and is designed to perpetuate divisions in American society. Instead, she said she believes the proposals have a clear political goal — “to ensure that Republicans can win in 2022".



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3A47rMZ