Thursday, September 30, 2021

World Vegetarian Day 2021: From history, significance to famous quotes, all you need to know

Every year on 1 October, World Vegetarian Day is observed and celebrated to highlight the benefits of vegetarianism. The day aims to promote compassion, life-enhancing possibilities, and joy in eating vegetarian dishes.

If you go to see, a vegetarian diet always focuses on seeds, legumes, green vegetables, fresh fruits, nuts, and grains. It also comprises healthy animal products such as dairy, eggs, and honey. Along with its benefits, the day also focuses on raising awareness about helping to preserve the Earth, saving animals and their lives.

History:

In 1977, World Vegetarian Day was founded and established by the North American Vegetarian Society (NAVS). The day was further recognised and endorsed in the year 1978 by International Vegetarian Union. Additionally, NAVS was founded in 1974; it is a non-profit tax-exempt educational organisation which is based in the United States.

According to NAVS, 1 October was selected as the official date of World Vegetarian Day to bring awareness towards ethical, health, environmental, and humanitarian benefits of a vegetarian lifestyle.

Significance:

On this special day, NAVS emphasizes two-pronged aims: the first is to provide a strong support network for affiliated groups, organisations, group members, and vegetarians in general. Secondly, NAVS intends to inform the common public about how vegetarianism benefits all, as well as animals and the planet as a whole.

Famous quotes related to Word Vegetarian Day:

- I have from an early age abjured the use of meat, and the time will come when men such as I will look upon the murder of animals as they now look upon the murder of men - Leonardo da Vinci (sculptor and architect)

- Animals are my friends...and I don't eat my friends- George Bernard Shaw (Irish playwright)
A man can live and be healthy without killing animals for food; therefore, if he eats meat, he participates in taking animal life merely for the sake of his appetite. And to act so is immoral - Leo Tolstoy (Russian writer)



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3usXtlK

International Coffee Day 2021: From history to significance, all you need to know

Many of us cannot start our day properly without a cup of coffee. So for us, it is unsurprising that there is a day dedicated to this beverage.

The International Coffee Day is observed on 1 October annually to promote and celebrate the use of coffee. The day is also used to create awareness about the history, benefits and popularity of the much-loved beverage. International Coffee Day aims at celebrating and highlighting the hard work of people associated with the coffee industry.

History:

The International Coffee Organisation (ICO), established in London in 1963, first declared the occasion of International Coffee Day on 1 October, 2015. However, the idea of an entire day dedicated to coffee goes long back.

The All Japan Coffee Association also promoted an event similar to International Coffee Day in 1983. The International Coffee Association also marked International Coffee Day in China in 1997. Countries such as Nepal and Taiwan also observed the day before 2015, with even the United States declaring a National Coffee Day in 2005.

The Southern Food and Beverage Museum first used the term ‘International Coffee Day’ at a press conference in 2009 to announce details about the first New Orleans Coffee Festival.

However, it was only after the ICO’s declaration in 2015 that the day began to be celebrated unanimously across the world.

Theme:

This year, the theme of International Coffee Day is “Coffee’s Next Generation”. The theme was chosen to provide people associated with the coffee industry with access to skill development, finance, knowledge and training and networking.

Significance:

International Coffee Day aims to promote the fair trade of coffee as well as create awareness about the plight of coffee growers globally. The day is dedicated to voice out against the injustices faced by the people associated with the industry.

International Coffee Day also highlights the millions of farmers who work hard and go an extra mile to bring the beverage to our lives.

This day is celebrated by people by gathering more knowledge about the history of coffee and the coffee industry. Several individuals also try out different types of coffee and dishes made by including the aromatic crop. Various events are organised in cafes, coffee shops and chain outlets to promote International Coffee Day.



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3D2Cqtn

International Day for Older Persons 2021: History, theme and significance of this day

The International Day of Older Persons is observed annually on 1 October to address the issues and challenges that elderly people face and look for solutions to them. The day is focused on the special needs, rights and well-being of elderly people.

According to the United Nations (UN), the section of the world’s population that is aged 60 years and above will reach over 1.5 billion in the year 2050, up from 900 million in 2015. The International Day for Older Persons aims to make the world aware about the need for social care and health provisions for the elderly.

History:

There were initiatives aimed at adopting a day to create awareness about the challenges faced by the elderly, with the Vienna International Plan of Action on Aging being chief among them. The plan was adopted by the 1982 World Assembly on Ageing. It was later endorsed by the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) in the same year.

On 14 December 1990, the UNGA designated 1 October as the International Day of Older Persons under Resolution 45/106 in its 68th plenary meeting.

Theme:

This year, the UN has decided that the theme for International Day for Older Persons is “Digital Equity for All Ages”. The theme emphasises on active and meaningful participation of the elderly people in the digital world as well as making the digital world more accessible to them.

The UN will focus on the need to include the elderly in the digital arena this year. It also aims to acknowledge the stereotypes, discrimination and prejudice that is associated with the process of digitisation.

The UN will also highlight policies and legal frameworks that ensure safety and privacy for elderly people in the digital world. It will also create “an intersectional person-centered human rights approach for a society for all ages” as well as a  legally binding instrument on the rights of elderly people, as per the official website of the UN.

Significance:

On this day, people acknowledge the contribution made by elderly people to society with the World Health Organisation (WHO) organising discussions on how to provide adequate healthcare for them.



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3utsLJb

Couple gets married at US-Canada border to allow bride's family to attend wedding amid COVID-19 curbs

The continuing coronavirus restrictions have prevented several people around the world from celebrating events such as weddings and anniversaries with their close family and friends. However, a couple got around the COVID-19 travel restrictions in USA and Canada by getting married at the border between the two countries.

Karen Mahoney and Brian Ray, residents of Cadyville, New York City, got engaged six months ago. The couple has known each other for 35 years. Both work as ski instructors and have been married previously. Both Ray and Mahoney wanted their families to attend their wedding on 25 September.
Mahoney’s parents and 96-year-old grandmother live in Canada. She wanted them to witness her big day and began planning any way that allowed her family to be present for her nuptials.

However, the wish seemed impossible to come true, as the pandemic had ceased all non-essential travel between the USA and Canada. While air travel between the two countries is possible, Mahoney’s grandmother was at increased risk of contracting the deadly virus, even though her family has been vaccinated.

Finally, the couple decided to get married on the US-Canada border. The wedding took place at a spot where the border crossing resembles a meadow, as per CNN. There were no fences in the way of the couple as they said their vows.

While an officiant from New York, the couple, and the wedding party stood on the American side of the border, Mahoney’s relatives were present on the Canadian side, enabling them to be present for her wedding. All ceremonies were done on the border, except for the signing of the marriage certificate, which was done after they were back in New York the next day.

Mahoney’s father said he wouldn’t have missed this event for anything. While he and the rest of Mahoney’s family were prevented from physically going over to the border to be part of the wedding, they were glad to be a part of it “in spirit”.



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3CULlNi

US woman claims she was charged for crying during surgery; hospital lists it as ‘Brief Emotion’

In a bizarre case, a woman from the United States claimed that a hospital charged money from her for crying during a mole removal surgery. Shocked over her experience and unexpected charge, the woman shared it on social media leading to a huge outcry on the internet.

Taking to her social media account, the woman, identified as Midge, shared a photo of the invoice that she received from the hospital. She sarcastically tweeted an image of her bill and wrote, “Mole removal: $223 Crying: extra”.

While sharing her post, Midge shared details on the calculation and charges incurred. But what caught everyone’s attention was one of the categories titled ‘Brief Emotion’. She was charged $11 (which is Rs 816 in Indian currency) for her outburst of emotion during the surgery. According to the viral photo, the bill states that Midge was charged $223 (Rs 16,556) for the main procedure but the extra $11 (Rs 816) has left social media users baffled.

Check out Midge’s post here:

Since being shared online, social media users are questioning her serious queries about the details and process of the American healthcare system. Along with numerous comments, her post also collected over 100k likes and around 10k retweets. Many users mocked and criticised the hospital for this bizarre addition to the bill while others requested the woman to complain to the higher authorities.

Among the serious comments, there were a few people on social media who also joked about it by drawing comparisons with Aerosmith’s songs like Crying and Sweet Emotions.

Moreover, the woman’s revelation over the bill on Twitter has raised several questions about the working and functioning of the American healthcare system.



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3ola8pT

Obsessed with Assange, Mike Pompeo wanted WikiLeaks founder kidnapped, assassinated or poisoned, claims report

The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), during Donald Trump’s presidency, had chalked out plans to kidnap and possibly assassinate Wikileaks founder Julian Assange when he was holed up in the Ecuadorian embassy in London, a report has claimed.

The report by Yahoo news states, "This Yahoo News investigation, based on conversations with more than 30 former US officials — eight of whom described details of the CIA’s proposals to abduct Assange — reveals for the first time one of the most contentious intelligence debates of the Trump presidency and exposes new details about the US government’s war on WikiLeaks. It was a campaign spearheaded by Mike Pompeo that bent important legal strictures, potentially jeopardised the Justice Department’s work toward prosecuting Assange, and risked a damaging episode in the United Kingdom, the United States’ closest ally."

The CIA has however declined to comment and Pompeo did not respond to requests for comment from the news agency. However, in a statement to Yahoo News, Trump denied that he ever considered having Assange assassinated. “It’s totally false, it never happened,” he said. Trump seemed to express some sympathy for Assange’s plight. “In fact, I think he’s been treated very badly,” he added.

Here's what the report says:

  1. The CIA plotted to kidnap the WikiLeaks founder in 2017, spurring heated debate among Trump administration officials over the legality and practicality of such an operation. A few senior officials even discussed killing Assange, going so far as to request “sketches” or “options” for how to assassinate him
  2. Even the possibility of poisoning Assange was discussed
  3. Pompeo publicly describe the group in 2017 as a “non-state hostile intelligence service.” The designation opened the door for agency operatives to take far more aggressive actions, treating the organisation as it does adversary spy services
  4. A Spanish security company UC Global, which was hired by Ecuador to help shield its embassy from prying eyes was in fact doing double duty —was providing US intelligence agencies with detailed reports of Assange’s activities and visitors as well as video and audio surveillance of Assange from secretly installed devices in the embassy, the employees testified.
  5. US Officials developed multiple tactical plans to thwart any Kremlin attempt to spring Assange, some of which envisioned clashes with Russian operatives in the British capital.

What warranted the anger

In March 2017, Wikileaks had published thousands of documents detailing the CIA's cyber-warfare programme.

Consequently, CIA director, Mike Pompeo, was seeking revenge on WikiLeaks and Assange, who had by then sought refuge in the Ecuadorian embassy to avoid extradition to Sweden on rape allegations he denied. Pompeo and other top agency leaders “were so embarrassed about Vault 7.... they were seeing blood.” “WikiLeaks was a complete obsession of Pompeo’s... After Vault 7, Pompeo and [Deputy CIA Director Gina] Haspel wanted vengeance on Assange,” as per the report.

Wikileaks

Wikileaks is a whistle-blowing website that was founded in December 2006. It is best known for:

  • Leaking gun camera footage of a 2007 airstrike by US Army helicopters in Baghdad that killed at least a dozen people, including two Reuters journalists, and wounded two young children.
  • Published several caches of classified and sensitive US government documents related to the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, as well as more than 250,000 US diplomatic cables.
  • The organisation helped Edward Snowden, a National Security Agency contractor who had fled to Hong Kong with a massive trove of classified materials, some of which revealed that the US government was illegally spying on Americans, escape to Russia.
  • In 2016 WikiLeaks published Democratic Party emails which is said to have impacted the election outcome.

Reaction

"As an American citizen, I find it absolutely outrageous that our government would be contemplating kidnapping or assassinating somebody without any judicial process simply because he had published truthful information,” Barry Pollack, Assange’s US lawyer has told Yahoo News. He hoped that the UK courts will consider this information and it will bolster its decision not to extradite him to the US.

Assange is now housed in a London prison as the courts there decide on a US request to extradite the WikiLeaks founder on charges of attempting to help former US Army analyst Chelsea Manning break into a classified computer network and conspiring to obtain and publish classified documents in violation of the Espionage Act.

With input from agencies



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3incroJ

Brother of slain Rohingya leader blames Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army for Mohibullah's murder

The brother of the international representative of ethnic Rohingya refugees Mohibullah, who was killed on Wednesday, Habibullah, on Thursday, blamed the Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army (ARSA) for the former's murder.  On Wednesday, unidentified attackers shot Mohibullah at the Kutupalong refugee camp at Ukhiya in Cox’s Bazar district. He was rushed to a hospital where he was declared dead. So far no group has claimed responsibility for the attack.

What Habibullah says

Habibullah told AFP that his brother received death threats from the ARSA in recent months and at least eight men from the group took part in the attack.

"ARSA forces have committed this murder. They often threatened to kill my brother from different (phone) numbers," he said. "ARSA did not just kill our brother, they killed our great leader."

Police have said at least four unidentified assailants were involved in the shooting, which happened as Mohibullah chatted with other community leaders outside his office.

However, there has been no immediate comment on Thursday from ARSA, which was behind a spate of attacks on Myanmar security posts in 2017 and is also blamed for attacks on Hindus living in the Rohingya villages in the country's western Rakhine province.

What Mohibullah's colleagues say

A senior member of Mohibullah's group also blamed ARSA, saying the militant group was enraged by his growing popularity in the refugee camps and his work, which gave the "Rohingya a non-violent, progressive and liberal voice of reason".

Rights activist Nur Khan Liton said Mohibullah told him earlier this month that he had received death threats from ARSA after his rights group expanded to all the Rohingya refugee camps.

"His peaceful activism angered ARSA," Liton told AFP.

Saad Hammadi from Amnesty International said the killing "sends a chilling effect across the entire community", calling on Dhaka to speed up the investigation.

What Dhaka Police says

Police spokesman Rafiqul Islam said the probe was still at a preliminary stage and no one has been arrested yet.

What human rights activists say

Human Rights Watch called Mohibullah a vital voice for the Rohingya community. “He always defended the rights of the Rohingya to safe and dignified returns and to have a say in the decisions concerning their lives and future. His killing is a stark demonstration of the risks faced by those in the camps who speak up for freedom and against violence,” Meenakshi Ganguly, the rights group’s South Asia director, said in a statement.

“Mohibullah’s death undermines not only the struggle of Rohingya refugees for greater rights and protection in the refugee camps but also their efforts to safely return to their homes in Myanmar. Bangladesh authorities should urgently investigate Mohibullah’s killing along with other attacks on Rohingya activists in the camps,” she said.

Amnesty International condemned the killing and urged Bangladeshi authorities and the UN Refugee Agency to work together to ensure the protection of people in the camps, including refugees, activists and humanitarian workers from both the Rohingya and local community, many of whom have shared concerns about their safety.

“Violence in the refugee camps in Cox’s Bazaar has been a growing problem,” said Saad Hammadi, Amnesty International’s South Asia campaigner. “Armed groups operating drug cartels have killed people and held hostages. The authorities must take immediate action to prevent further bloodshed.”

Overall, Bangladesh has been sheltering more than 1.1 million Rohingya refugees from Myanmar after previous waves of persecution.

Who was Mohibullah?

Mohibullah had set up the Arakan Rohingya Society for Peace and Human Rights (ARSPH), a community-based rights group that documented atrocities allegedly committed against the group by the Myanmar military during a 2017 offensive. He had emerged as a key refugee leader and a spokesman representing the Muslim ethnic group in international meetings. He visited the White House in 2019 for a meeting on religious freedom with then-President Donald Trump and spoke about the suffering and persecution faced by Rohingya in Myanmar.

Later, the same year, the former schoolteacher was bitterly criticised by Bangladeshi media after he led a massive rally of 200,000 refugees to mark the second anniversary of the crackdown by Myanmar’s military that caused about 700,000 Rohingya, including Mohibullah, to flee to neighboring Bangladesh.



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3CYTWyB

India-China ties: Speeches by envoys Vikram Misri and Sun Weidong indicate no end to border tension is in sight

Between the Afghanistan fiasco — a horror story without any ending, the transatlantic ruckus over AUKUS, the Evergrande mess, Xi Jinping’s regulatory crackdown and resurrection of Maoism in China, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s trip to the United States and the maiden ‘in-person’ Quad Leaders’ Summit — the border standoff between India and China has dropped off the headlines. Lack of media attention doesn’t mean the situation is easing on the ground. If anything, since the disengagement of troops from Gogra early August, China yet again seems to be upping the ante.

And as always, Chinese steps are incremental, staying just below the radar on the ground to avoid large-scale attention but backed by heavy-duty signaling. Media reports emerged this week that on 30 August, PLA troops numbering over 100 (some on horseback) had crossed the border via Tun Jun La pass to enter Barahoti in Uttarakhand where they smashed some infrastructure, including a bridge, but retreated before being challenged by Indian soldiers.

It is not so much the intrusion into 5 km of Indian territory, but the number of PLA troops involved in the provocation that reportedly alarmed the Indian security establishment. As Economic Times points out, Barahoti intrusion in 1954 by the Chinese was part of a sequence of events that eventually led to the 1962 war.

Then there were reports, also this month, that PLA’s Western Theatre Command has introduced more night drills for troops and is bringing in advanced equipment for units stationed near the Himalayan border. South China Morning Post, quoting Chinese media, reported that PLA soldiers are practicing nighttime live-fire gun drills. Cutting-edge weapons such as truck-mounted 122mm multiple system rocket launchers are being deployed. Additionally, the PLA is replacing all old generation J-7 fighter jets along the LAC with the advanced J-16 multirole strike fighters.

We also saw reports this month of China testing its air defence forces against “possible Indian missiles or jets” in drills on the Tibetan plateau, constructing “at least 10 new airbases along the Line of Actual Control in Ladakh, Uttarakhand and Arunachal Pradesh besides ramping up infrastructure at its exiting airbases close to the Indian frontier” and, curiously, PLA officers “contacting guides and ex-terrorists in Pakistan Occupied Kashmir” who have a good understanding of the “topography of Kashmir valley, Ladakh and Jammu regions.”

It isn’t clear (it never is) why China is launching a series of provocations, but it is worth noting that PLA’s Western Theatre Command, which includes Tibet and Xinjiang military districts and is responsible for border security along the LAC, underwent rapid recent changes in leadership with General Wang Haijiang in September becoming the fourth head of the command since the border crisis escalated with India, and the third change in WTC this year.

And according to The Print, another significant military promotion ostensibly targeted at India occurred this month with Liu Lin, a general who is known to Indians due to his presence during border negotiations, taking over as the commander of Xinjiang military district.

More alarmingly, the PLA’s Western Theatre Command is installing modular container-based accommodations for troops in several high-altitude locations in eastern Ladakh such as near Tashigong, Manza, Hot Springs and Churup where Indian and Chinese troops are in forward-deployment posture. These shelters are meant for withstanding extreme cold weather, indicating that China anticipates escalation of tension even during the severe Himalayan winter.

None of these developments and signallings are exceptional in isolation, but taken together they represent a pattern, indicating that China doesn’t want to let calmness prevail along the border even as it pitches for normalcy in bilateral ties.

It is futile to search for reasons behind Chinese behavior because its actions are deliberately aimed at spreading confusion and ambiguity so that the adversaries remain on edge, always fearful of inviting Chinese wrath and consequently adopting a more cautious stance. China considers this ambiguity leverage, and it loathes giving it up. Right through the standoff in eastern Ladakh that resulted in the deadly Galwan clash last year, China has consistently blamed India and continues to do so, even though it was PLA’s land-grab in April 2020 that sparked the crisis.

Last Friday, Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian at a press briefing said “the Galwan Valley incident last year was caused by the Indian side’s illegal trespass of the LAC to encroach on Chinese territory, in violation of previously-signed treaties and agreements.”

There have been speculations that India’s infrastructure-building spree and raising of a new mountain corps — the 17 Mountain Strike Corps has been allocated to the Eastern Command and is now fully operational — may have displeased China but this is exactly what Beijing wants New Delhi to surmise so that the onus of the border tension lies on India.

It has been encouraging to note that India (albeit belatedly) is calling out China’s tactics of obfuscation that allow Beijing the space to be aggressive while posing as the victim. In a recent speech, delivered on 23 September as part of a Track-II dialogue organised by Indian and Chinese institutes, India’s ambassador to China Vikram Misri pointed out some home truths. His speech came on the same day, and as part of the same dialogue, that also saw the Chinese ambassador to India Sun Weidong delivering an address.

It is worth juxtaposing the two speeches that came within a few hours of each other and are reflective of the gulf that exists between the two sides. Let’s take up the Chinese ambassador’s talk first. But before we do so, it would make sense to note that this event was held at a time when global attention was cornered by the AUKUS pact and the Quad Leaders’ Summit hosted by US president Joe Biden in Washington DC — both developments that are indicative of the intensification of great power rivalry between the US and China.

And it is this that Chinese ambassador Sun chose to highlight. He accused India of adopting a more realist stance vis-à-vis China instead of putting faith in “Asian solidarity” and suggested that as “two major oriental countries, China and India should avoid falling into the trap of outdated western thinking.”

This is interesting because notions of a mythical ‘Asian solidarity’ led early Indian thinking into believing notions that China and India’s rise would be complementary. It took the bitter defeat in 1962 for Jawaharlal Nehru to realise that pan-Asian solidarity is a mirage. Recent Indian stance towards China has been governed by a realist understanding — prompted no doubt by China’s policy of territorial aggrandisement — that as a presumptive superpower in the same geography, China sees India as a threat to its hegemonic ambitions and would employ all tools at its disposal to ‘manage’ India’s rise.

India knows that internal balancing is a time-consuming exercise. It would take at least a couple of decades of sustained, near double-digit growth for India to measure up to China in terms of composite national power. This is an objective that will take a democratic India more time to achieve compared to China’s authoritarian political system. Therefore, governed by a realist approach, India is investing in balancing coalitions such as the Quad, entering into foundational agreements with the US, and strengthening bilateral ties with Japan, Australia and France to close the yawning power gap.

China doesn’t like this but pretends as if its imperial expansionism wasn’t the prime factor behind India’s adoption of an external balancing strategy. Notably, India’s enthusiasm for the Quad increased manifold after 20 Indian troops were killed in the Galwan Valley clash.

“Some Indian people think that China has become India’s ‘major threat’ and ‘strategic rival’. It is a serious strategic miscalculation. If such judgment is translated into India's foreign policy, it would probably become a ‘self-fulfilling prophecy’,” said Sun.

Behind his apparently benevolent remarks lie the accusation that it is India that is marking China as an adversary and strategic rival, while China wishes nothing but well for India and “peaceful development” for both nations. The irony of delivering these grandiose statements even as PLA troops engage in live-fire drills along the LAC and intrude into Indian territory is lost on the Chinese envoy. Instead, he claims that China is a victim of Indian aggression.

Sun says that India shouldn’t insist on peace and tranquility as a prerequisite for progress in bilateral relations because “we should avoid taking a part for the whole, or losing sight of the forest for the trees… peace and tranquility in the border areas is important, but it is not the whole story of the bilateral relations.”

Perhaps Sun is unaware that Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi, in a recent meeting with US climate envoy John Kerry, said that through the US hopes to “transform bilateral cooperation into an ‘oasis’ in Sino-US relations, but if the ‘oasis’ is surrounded by ‘deserts,’ the ‘oasis’ will sooner or later be deserted. The Sino-US climate change cooperation cannot be separated from the general environment of Sino-US relations.”

It may seem that China has adopted ‘one country, two foreign policy’ system whereby Beijing’s climate cooperation is incumbent on general improvement in Sino-US bilateral ties, but India should keep its border tension in a separate silo and focus on improving bilateral ties. It may strike as a particularly hypocritical argument to the rest of the world but for China it is ‘logical’, because the asymmetric dimension of Sino-Indian ties (that are loaded in China’s favour) is different from the Sino-US power asymmetry. Therefore, while China may demand some concessions from the US, it is not ready to give those concessions to India. And it doesn’t understand why India keeps insisting that it be treated as an equal.

Also notable are Sun’s comments where he says: “China and India should uphold strategic autonomy and grasp fate in our own hands… At present, some countries, with their ideological bias and Cold War mentality, vigorously seek closed and exclusive ‘small cliques’ with the aim of containing the third party, stoking bloc confrontation and geopolitical games… Once getting on someone else’s ship, one is no longer able to have the steer in control… We should uphold true strategic autonomy, not only in words, but more importantly, in deeds.”

While China doesn’t consider India as its peer competitor, it nevertheless fears a situation where India is drawn tightly into the American security arc (not necessarily as a treaty ally). American support, even if tactical, could be a force-multiplier and make India truly competitive in China’s eyes — a vindication of the balancing strategy that India has chosen to adopt.

As Stimson Center scholar Yun Sun wrote in War on the Rocks last year, “the US factor has become the most important consideration in China’s policy toward India. For China, the prospect of facing the American military at sea and the Indian military along its southern border and in the Indian Ocean becomes much more real and dangerous with defense cooperation between the US and India.”

China believes that the US seeks to enmesh India in institutionalised frameworks (for example, Quad) and India would play along even at the cost of bartering its strategic autonomy, though it may claim otherwise. Sun’s ‘worry’ over India’s perceived loss of autonomy is therefore insincere because it indicates China doesn’t want India to strike strategic partnerships and punch above its weight.

This theme, that India’s strategic posture is a reaction to China’s imperial ambitions and hegemonic behaviour runs right through ambassador Misri’s address at the same forum. Notably, the Indian envoy makes it clear quite early on that India’s stance towards China is not governed by any prejudice towards China’s rise but is the result of the “situation in eastern Ladakh” that must take precedence over every other bilateral consideration.

To the extent that this Track-II initiative was an extension of the diplomatic manoeuvres underway, it was worth noting that Misri stressed on “consistency between words and actions” and presented “three obstacles” that may hinder both sides in getting a solution to the most “pressing issue in bilateral ties”.

Misri’s entire speech is worth reading in full, but paragraphs 7 and 8 — where he elaborates on the first obstacle — deserve close attention.

“For long, the Indian and Chinese sides have adhered to a well-understood distinction between resolving the Boundary Question and managing border affairs. The 1988 understanding between our leaders was precisely for keeping the resolution of the Boundary Question on a track separate yet parallel to the bilateral relationship, with maintenance of peace and tranquillity as the prerequisite. The Special Representatives mechanism, the Agreement on Political Parameters and Guiding Principles of 2005 and the three-phase framework were all designed in order to work on the Boundary Question, which we agreed was a complex and sensitive issue requiring time to work through.

On the other hand, for managing border affairs on a daily basis, we evolved a mechanism, consisting of instruments such as the WMCC and a succession of agreements, protocols and CBMs, in order to govern behaviour on the ground and ensure peace and tranquillity. A serious violation of peace and tranquillity in the border areas naturally requires us to apply our minds on the basis of established agreements, protocols and mechanisms to resolve it. As we do so, any attempt to confuse border affairs with the Boundary Question is a disservice to the work of those involved in finding solutions…”

Misri has cut through China’s strategy of deliberate obfuscation and presented Beijing’s attempt to change the status quo in eastern Ladakh for what it is — naked terrestrial aggression by an imperial power that masks bellicosity in perpetual victimhood.

Misri then points out that “it cannot be that only one side’s concerns are of relevance while the other side’s case goes unheard. Safeguarding territorial integrity and national security holds equal value for both sides… And to press one’s own concerns and disregard the other side’s concerns and sensitivities without any explanation or recourse goes beyond disrespect. It actually creates even more obstacles to finding solutions.”

The point being made here is that both countries are “equal” and there is no place for a Sino-centric hierarchical framework where China (Zhongguo) is the Middle Kingdom and the cradle of human civilization and the rest of the world is divided into tributaries or barbarians. In other words, India is letting China know that it doesn’t accept China’s hegemonic ambitions despite the power asymmetry between the two sides.

Misri also pointed out that bilateral ties “are substantial enough and sufficiently complex that they require their own approach and appropriate handling, without imaginary third factors complicating them further and distracting us from working on our priorities.”

This is a rejection of China’s accusation that India is bartering its strategic autonomy for a closer strategic embrace of the US. In other words, India’s balancing strategy will continue.

Be that as it may, the sequence of recent events on the border and the twin speeches exemplifies the complete breakdown of trust between both sides. The gulf is seemingly irreconcilable and growing because China’s aggression towards India, governed by a belief in Beijing that India has hegemonic ambitions of its own and could be a threat to its Tibetan flank, is forcing New Delhi into a deterrence posture and taking both countries into opposite directions.

And if Chinese pressure is aimed at persuading India not to align with the US or be assertive in its dealings with Beijing, then China needs to revise its policy because that is ensuring the exact opposite outcome.



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3CYNvvp

What's in an ice age? Discover how, why and how often they happen

Auckland: What is an ice age? Do they have to last a certain amount of time to count, how did they vary and how many ice ages has the Earth experienced?

As with many definitions of natural phenomena, a precise definition of an ice age isn't straightforward.

Ice ages form during protracted periods of a relatively cooler Earth. A definition must include the condition that the Earth is sufficiently cool for permanent ice formation.

A second part of an ice age definition is the end result of protracted cooling. Ice ages lead to the development of continental ice sheets in the northern and southern hemispheres, and the growth of glaciers in mountainous parts of the world, such as the Himalayas, Alps, Southern Alps and Andes.

A third part of the definition involves time. For an ice age to be recorded as significant, it must last for a geologically significant amount of time.

If we bring all these factors together, then an ice age occurs during times of protracted lower temperatures, resulting in significant areas covered in ice for millions to tens or even hundreds of millions of years.

Variations within an ice age

Ice ages are not uniformly cold. There can be colder and warmer periods during the overall ice-age period. Colder periods lead to more extensive areas of continental ice sheets, valley glaciers and sea ice, while warmer periods lead to reduced areas of ice.

Cold ice-age periods on Earth are called stadials, while warmer parts of an ice age are known as inter-stadials. An ice age ends when the Earth warms enough for the ice cover to recede, or disappear completely.

The regions on the fringes of extensive ice sheets and glaciers experience a cooling to the point that a consistently cold environment forms.

Usually, the ground is frozen for much of the year, growing seasons are short, and only the hardiest of flora and fauna survive. The Russian tundra is an example of this landscape.

These environments are called periglacial and occupy areas between relatively warmer ice-free regions and permanent ice fields.

Ice ages and the Earth's climate

Ice ages change the Earth's climatic belts. Temperate and tropical zones become restricted to the lower equatorial latitudes.

A question that follows on from the definition of an ice age is: how cold does Earth have to become to produce one? Earth's average global temperature today is around 16 degree Celsius.

Analysis of proxy temperature data (e.g. from the modelling of deep-ocean sediment isotope compositions) over the past 500 million years of Earth's history indicates that average global temperatures have varied between around -10 degree Celsius and +30 degree Celsius.

During the most recent glacial maximum (stadial, 23,000 to 11,000 years ago), the average global temperature was about 8 degree Celsius, with polar regions experiencing average temperatures of -2 degree Celsius. Ice-free periods over the past 500 million years correspond with average global temperatures of over 20 degree Celsius.

There is no official minimum period of time for an ice age. Some colder periods in historical times are termed little ice ages, including between the 13th and 18th centuries. This period was characterised by longer and colder winters, and shorter, cooler summers. Rivers regularly froze over in winter in western Europe. The stunning artwork of the

Dutch painter Hendrick Avercamp (15851634 CE) documents aspects of this period.

How many ice ages has the Earth experienced?

Geologists agree Earth has gone through six major global ice ages. The oldest ice age occurred some 2,900-2,780 million years ago. The most recent ice age is the one we are currently experiencing, the late Cainozoic-Quaternary Ice Age, which began around 34 million years ago with the glaciation of Antarctica.

Between these two ice-age periods, other ice ages occurred at 2,400-2,100, 715-550, 450-420 and 360-260 million years ago. These six major ice ages lasted between 300 and 30 million years respectively.

Ice ages vary in length of time, extent, and extremes of temperature. The most extensive ice age was the period referred to as Snowball Earth when geologists think ice reached all the way to the equator, some 700 million years ago.

At other times within ice ages (such as today), ice is mainly restricted to polar regions and higher mountain chains. But at its greatest extent, the present glacial period produced ice sheets as far south as the southern Great Lakes in the US and the river Thames in the UK. Mountain glaciers also extended much further and sea levels were some 120 metres lower than today.

There are many factors that cause ice ages. The main ones include variations in Earth's orbit, known as Milankovitch cycles, reductions in solar energy emissions, lower atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations, variations in ocean currents, tectonic activity, continental configurations, mountain building periods and global volcanism.



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/39NTffb

Prime Minister Narendra Modi's US visit 'very successful', says Ambassador Taranjit Singh Sandhu

Washington: Prime Minister Narendra Modi had a very successful visit to the US during which he held his maiden bilateral meeting with President Joe Biden and had a good candid and substantial exchange with like-minded Quad leaders at their first in-person summit, India's envoy here has said.

Remarks by India's ambassador to the US, Taranjit Singh Sandhu, came at a dinner event hosted by Indiaspora on Wednesday.

"We just had a very successful visit here", Sandhu said.

The dinner was attended by the who's who of the Indian-American community.

Eminent members of the Indian-American community had gathered for the first time in the national capital after the COVID-19 pandemic hit the country.

During the visit, there was an important bilateral meeting between President Biden and Prime Minister Modi, the first one since the Biden-Harris administration was inaugurated in January this year.

The two leaders had earlier met in 2014 and 2016 when Biden was the vice president of the country.

So, it was not the first time they were meeting, but the bilateral meeting was very good, Sandhu said in his first public appearance after last week's visit of Prime Minister Modi.

The interaction with Vice President Kamala Harris went very well, he said.

The Quad summit hosted by Biden at the White House and attended by Modi along with their counterparts from Japan and Australia really went off very well, he said.

"There was a good candid and substantial exchange between all the four leaders," he said, adding that there are practical areas in which the corporation is moving quite ahead.

"In fact, in vaccines, all the four countries are bringing their respective strengths together and we are on our way to producing one billion vaccines in 2022 which will be distributed over the Indo-Pacific particularly in Southeast Asia", Sandhu said.

Meanwhile, Atul Keshap, 50, a career United States Foreign Service Officer, who too attended the dinner, said there has been a qualitative improvement in the relationship between the US and India.

He said, “in my 70 days in Delhi, what I noticed was a qualitative improvement in the bilateral relationship between the United States and India.” The level of trust and confidence, respect and love between the two countries truly is at an all-time high, he added.

Keshap has recently returned from New Delhi where he served as US' interim Charg d'affaires.

During his stay in Washington DC, Prime Minister Modi met Prime Minister Scott Morrison from Australia and Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga of Japan. During his trips, the US handed over 150 historic antiquities to India, which the prime minister took with him on his return to India.

From Washington DC, the Prime Minister went to New York where he addressed the UN General Assembly.

With inputs from PTI



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3uo8Kno

Former French president Nicolas Sarkozy convicted of illegally financing his 2012 re-election campaign

Former French president Nicholas Sarkozy (66) was found guilty in Thursday in charges of illegal campaign financing and overspending during his 2012 re-election campaign.

Sarkozy, 66, is accused of having spent nearly twice the maximum legal limit — €22.5 million ($27.5 million) —on his failed bid for a second term in office, when he lost to Socialist Francois Hollande.

He will find out his sentence when the judge finishes reading her verdict. Sarkozy wasn’t present at the Paris court for the verdict’s announcement.

The court stated that Sarkozy “knew” the legal limit was at stake and “voluntarily” failed to supervise additional expenses. Prosecutors have requested a six-month prison term, as well as a six-month suspended sentence and a fine of 3,750 euros ($4,354).

Sarkozy, France’s president from 2007 to 2012, has vigorously denied wrongdoing during the trial in May and June. He can appeal the decision.

Prison sentence for corruption in another case

Thursday’s verdict comes after Sarkozy, 66, was found guilty on 1 March of corruption and influence peddling in another case. He was given one year in prison and two years suspension in that case but is free pending appeal.

In the campaign financing case, prosecutors concluded that Sarkozy knew weeks before the 2012 election that his expenses — which are strictly limited under French law — were getting close to the legal maximum. They accused him of having ignored two notes from his accountants warning about the money issue.

Views of prosecutors

Prosecutors argued Sarkozy is “the only person responsible for his campaign financing” and that he chose to exceed the limit by organizing many rallies, including giant ones.

Sarkozy's version about illegal campaign financing

During his hearing, Sarkozy told the court the extra money didn’t go into his campaign, but instead helped make other people richer. He denied any “fraudulent intent.” He also insisted he didn’t handle the day-to-day organization because he had a team to do that and therefore couldn’t be blamed for the amount of spending.

Others who were involved

In addition to the former president, 13 other people went on trial, including members of his conservative Republicans party, accountants and heads of the communication group in charge of organizing the rallies, Bygmalion. They face charges including forgery, breach of trust, fraud and complicity in illegal campaign financing.

Some have acknowledged wrongdoing and detailed the system of false invoices that aimed to cover up the overspending.

Prosecutors have requested mostly suspended prison sentences, and up to one year in prison for Bygmalion’s co-founder.

Sarkozy is still active in French politics?

Sarkozy retired from active politics in 2017, but is still playing a role behind the scenes. French media have reported that he is involved in the process of choosing a conservative candidate ahead of France’s presidential election next year.

With inputs from AP and AFP



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3m5e8rS

Danish artist takes $84,000 from museum; submits two blank canvases titled ‘Take the Money and Run’

A Danish artist has kept the money he was given by a museum to create a piece of artwork and submitted two blank canvases. He has also altered the name of his installation to “Take the Money and Run” as a mark of protest against low wages.

The Kunsten Museum of Modern Art in Aalborg gave Jens Hanning roughly 534,000 kroner ($84,000) in cash to recreate two of his earlier artworks. The pieces had bank notes attached to a canvas and represented the average annual wage in Austria and Denmark. The museum also paid Hanning 25,000 kroner ($3,900) for the artwork, scheduled to be exhibited at “Work It Out”, the museum’s exhibition on money and labour conditions, which opened on 24 September.

But the canvases were blank when museum officials received them. Instead of bank notes stuck to the canvases between glass frames, they found empty canvases and no sign of the money.

Hanning claims that the work of art is that he “took their money”. Calling it a statement on his current work situation, the artist said that what he did could not be considered theft, but rather a “breach of contract, and the breach of contract is part of the work”.

According to the contract he had signed with the museum, Hanning was required to give back the money after the exhibition was over.

He declined to reveal where the money was to the P1 channel, a part of Danish broadcaster DR. He also refused to pay back the amount.

Hanning believes that the blank canvases symbolise his present working conditions and a commentary against the poor remuneration offered by the museum. He also encouraged people to “take the money and run” if they are being forced to give money “to go to work”.

The museum wants Hanning to return the money and plans to report him to the police if the money is not returned by January, when the exhibition ends.



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3kQK97E

World Maritime Day 2021: Recognising the significance of maritime industry in COVID-19 times

World Maritime Day is observed every year across the globe by the International Maritime Organisation (IMO). The day is observed annually on the last Thursday of September to acknowledge and honour seafarers. This year, the special day is being marked today, 30 September.

The day is also recognises and appreciate the significance of the maritime industry. It encourages people to consider issues of maritime security, safety, maritime environment, and shipping.

The global shipping industry has played a vital role in the global response to the COVID-19 pandemic and the world witnessed the professionalism and sacrifice of seafarers who carried out their duties.

On the occasion, Union minister Sarbananda Sonowal, who recently resigned from Assam Assembly, took to social media and thanked the seafaring community for all the help and support.

Theme

This year, the theme for World Maritime Day is “Seafarers: At the core of shipping’s future”. It aims to extend the visibility of seafarers by focusing on the vital roles they play.

History

World Maritime Day was instituted by the United Nations (UN) in 1948. The international conference in Geneva passed a convention establishing the IMO in order to celebrate the contribution of the maritime sector towards the global economy.

Then in 1982, the IMO took the name Intergovernmental Maritime Consultative Organization (IMCO). Later, on 17 March 1978, World Maritime Day was celebrated for the first time.

Significance

The IMO chose 2021 to be marked as a year of action for seafarers who faced various hardships because of the COVID-19 crisis. It must be understood that shipping has continued to transport more than 80 percent of world trade, including vital medical supplies, food and other basic goods that are critical for the COVID-19 response and recovery – but hundreds of thousands of seafarers face a humanitarian crisis as they have been stranded at sea, unable to get off the ships they operate with contracts extended by many months. This needs to be addressed urgently, through governments designating seafarers as essential workers and ensuring safe crew changes can take place.



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3ijolQy

Wednesday, September 29, 2021

Watch: Woman takes mother diagnosed with dementia on trip to Ireland; viral video leaves netizens in tears

Social media users are getting emotional over the video of a woman who took her mother (who has been diagnosed with dementia) to Ireland on a 10-day trip.

Stephanie Martin, who took her mother on the trip, said that a few years ago, the doctors had diagnosed the latter with frontal temporal dementia. The diagnosis gave a time frame of six to eight years before the memory loss completely set in and made Martin’s mother forget everyone she knew.

To fulfill her mother’s long-time wish, Martin decided to take her on a 10-day trip to Ireland, including a destination where she had always wanted to visit- the cliffs of Moher.

Martin posted a compilation of some moments from their trip. The 17-second video shows the mother-daughter duo at the cliff and other locations as well. Martin’s mother can be seen breaking down in some of the moments.

Posting the video on Instagram, Martin said that it was one of her favourite memories from the trip.

Social media users were left emotional due to the video. Several appreciated Martin’s gesture for her mother.

The video has gone viral on the internet, receiving over 2.2 million views and one lakh likes on Instagram.

This is not the only wholesome video that has grabbed eyeballs on social media lately. A few days ago, the video of a woman carrying her 93-year-old grandmother as they danced around won hearts over the internet.

The clip showed 33-year-old Allison Krause recreating a special moment from her childhood with her grandmother Marie Frances O'Brien, when the latter used to dance while carrying Krause in her arms. The duo recreated the moment with Krause holding O’Brien in her arms as they danced.

The video was posted initially on TikTok, with the footage switching between Krause and O’Brien dancing in the present day and the duo dancing in the past. The clip received immense appreciation on social media, with several users feeling nostalgic for their own parents. Many also praised the close bond that O’Brien and Krause share.



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3mqLqlB

Teenage terrorist held on Line of Control reveals Lashkar-e-Taiba still operates in plain sight across Pakistan

Late one Friday morning in November, 2012, small groups of men solemnly filed through the dust-blown road in the small town of Basirpur in Pakistan’s southern Punjab, past Waris Ali’s grocery store and Nice Tailors, to the Ammar bin-Aas mosque. Two days earlier, 26/11 terrorist Muhammad Ajmal Amir Kasab had walked to the gallows at Pune’s Yerwada jail; the men in Basirpur gathered at the Lashkar-e-Taiba’s local markaz, or centre, to conduct funeral rites for the local boy they hailed as a martyr.

Ali Babar Patran, the teenage jihadist held by the Indian Army near the Line of Control this week—in the course of the most serious clashes since February’s ceasefire—was then 10 years old. Like hundreds of others, he watched the spectacle from the sidelines, little understanding the significance of these events.

Late in 2018, though, Indian investigators believe, Ali Babar was recruited to train at the Lashkar-e-Taiba’s Khyber camp outside Garhi Habibullah, in Pakistan’s Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa. Following three weeks of military training and indoctrination in January 2019, investigators allege, Babar was sent home—until called up, in April, to prepare to cross the Line of Control and fight in Kashmir.

The story of Ali Babar and the Ammar bin-Anas Markaz casts new light on Lashkar as the group continues to operate in plain sight, despite international proscription, and an ostensible ban in Pakistan itself.

§

Like many of their neighbours, Ali Babar’s ancestors had relocated around the village of Wasewawala, just outside of Basirpur, from Patran, near Patiala, in the colonial period, when Imperial Britain began building an elaborate system of canals through western Punjab. The irrigation network transformed the fortunes of the dominant landholding Jat caste; elites from the community have since dominated local politics and the economy.

Tiny Wasewawala has seen significant development, in large part because of the political power of its élite Wattoo clan—the most illustrious member of which is Mian Manzoor Ahmed Wattoo, who briefly served as Punjab’s chief minister under prime minister Yousaf Raza Gilani, in 1996. The village even has its own cricket stadium.

For families of agricultural labourers like Ali Babar’s parents, though, development brought few benefits. Ali Babar’s father, who passed away when he was four years old, left few assets. Even though Ali Babar was the family’s only child—bar a girl adopted from even poorer relatives—he dropped out of school in the seventh grade, and never held a job.

The Lashkar mosque in Basirpur. Image procured by Praveen Swami

Ever since the late 1970s, with the support of General Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq’s Islamist-leaning military dictatorship, networks of seminaries and mosques linked to jihadist groups like the Jaish-e-Muhammad, Lashkar-e-Jhangvi and Lashkar-e-Taiba had blossomed across southern Punjab, reaching out to these impoverished families.

Lacking “alternative ideology like Marxism or liberalism or even the language symbols which may challenge the feudal stranglehold”, the scholar Tahir Kamran has noted, “militancy remains one of the few ways to counter it”.

Fed up with his life as a labourer, Ali Babar began spending time with the jihadist gatherings at the Ammar bin-Aas centre from the winter of 2018. From the mosque, he would have seen the bright lights of the al-Nur and Chishti marriage palaces across the road, where the town’s élite celebrated weddings and events. Lacking any prospect of entry to this earthly paradise, Ali Babar listened, instead, to stories of the rivers of wine and heavenly maidens who awaited jihad martyrs in paradise.

In interrogation by Indian intelligence services, two sources involved in his questioning told Network18, Ali Babar said he was initially drawn to the Lashkar by the prospect of military training and using weapons—not religion.

At the Khyber training centre in January, 2019, though, Ali Babar developed close bonds with Atiq-ur-Rehman—slain on September 26, in the firefight which led to his capture. A much older jihadist from Attock who had received religious training at a Lashkar-linked seminary, Atiq-ur-Rehman introduced Ali Babar to the Lashkar’s ideological programme of war to conquer India for Islam. Like many other young jihadists, Ali Babar seems to have found a sense of purpose in the camp lacking in his everyday life.

§

Ali Babar’s story is exceptional only in its detail: cases of the Lashkar preying on the semi-educated rural poor of southern and central Punjab to fill its ranks are common. Like Ali Babar, 26/11 terrorist Ajmal Kasab—who grew up just five kilometres from Ali Babar’s village, in Faridkot—grew up in grinding poverty. Muhammad Amir Iman, Kasab’s father, wran a snack-cart, selling dahi puris in the village. His mother, Noori Tai, was a homemaker, and mother of four.

The family spent its meagre earnings on educating their oldest son, Afzal Iman, and could not afford to educate Ajmal past fourth grade. Ajmal dropped out of the government primary school at Faridkot in 2000 when he was 13, and went to live with his older brother. He never settled in a trade, and would frequently shuttle between Faridkot and Lahore.

Image procured by Praveen Swami

Ajmal soon began spending time with small-time criminals in Lahore. Along with a friend, a one-time Attock resident named Muzaffar Lal Khan, Ajmal decided to launch a new career in armed robbery. On Bakr Eid day in 2007, he later told the Mumbai Police, the two men made their way to Raja Bazaar in Rawalpindi, hoping to purchase guns—and ended up joining the Lashkar instead, hoping to secure the weapons needed for the crime.

Lashkar jihadist Sajjad Ahmad, captured in 2009, Aiz Baksh, a landless agricultural labourer and homemaker Pathani Mai in the village of Kot Addu, Ahmad is the third of four sons and a daughter. Like his brothers, Sajjad didn’t have much of an education. Having dropped out of the local municipal school in Class 4, at age 10, Sajjad and his younger brother Javed Iqbal were put to work, grazing cattle for local landowners.

In 2011, Sajjad was convicted of murdering a man he thought was stalking his teenage sweetheart, Hajira Mai. Following his release from prison, Hajira Mai’s parents refused to allow her to marry Ahmad—leading him to drugs, and, eventually, seeking redemption by joining the Lashkar.

§

Instead of heading across the Line of Control in 2019, though, Ali Babar was asked to go home to Basirpur. The reasons aren’t entirely clear, but the answer likely had something to do with the lethal terrorist attack on Indian police forces in Pulwama that February. Faced with war threats, Pakistan’s National Security Committee, chaired by Prime Minister Imran Khan, had reinstated a ban on the Lashkar’s parent organisation, the Jamaat-ud-Dawa.

Like other jihadist groups, the Lashkar came under pressure from Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence directorate to disband its camps, and empty them of jihadists.

The action ran to a well-worn script. Faced with international pressure following a 2001 attack on Parliament House in New Delhi, the ISI had shut down the Lashkar—only for it to emerge inside months.

The Lashkar mosque in Basirpur. Image procured by Praveen Swami

Following 26/11, Pakistan again promised a crackdown. “Even if Saeed is technically not roaming the streets, the Government of Pakistan’s inability to win the legal case against him is embarrassing,” then-United States Ambassador Anne Patterson wrote in a cable to the State Department. “Realising the importance of Saeed’s detention, [Prime Minister Yusuf Raza] Gilani and [Interior Minister Rehman] Malik are determined to use any law or means to keep him confined to his home”.

Again, however, the Lashkar and Saeed were set free, raising funds and recruiting cadre through a Punjab-wide network of centres like the Ammar bin-Aas centre. In 2016, following the Lashkar’s attack on an Indian Army base in Uri, the terrorist group even put up posters for funeral prayers in Gujaranwala to honour the slain terrorists.

The Lashkar chief was eventually convicted on terrorism financing charges and announced to have been jailed—only to be exposed, by an assassination attempt alleged to have been conducted by Indian intelligence, to be living at home in Lahore.

In April this year, though, Ali Babar was recalled to the Garhi Habibullah camp, and then sent on to an outpost on the Shawai Nullah, near Muzaffarabad in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. According to investigators, given further training in an advanced class called the Daura Hatf, or Tour of Revenge. For four months, the young jihadist was taught to use matrix sheets for encrypted communication and operate Global Position System sets.

Then, in September, along with other Lashkar operatives positioned elsewhere on along the Line of Control, Ali Babar was launched across the mountain passes leading to Uri. The groups are believed to have included both trained fighters and porters carrying large caches of weapons and ammunition, to supply terrorists already operating inside Kashmir.

In India’s intelligence community and military, there is mounting concern more infiltration could follow. Levels of violence have been low since February; far fewer terrorists have been shot in Kashmir this year, compared with the same last year, a rough-and-ready index of infiltration levels. Fired up by its triumph in Afghanistan, and the pressure the Indian Army faces on its eastern border with China, the ISI might be lifting the shackles it placed on jihadists in 2019, the argument goes.

There’s no way to know if the ISI will take the risks—of international pressure or even war—that would come with resuming the jihad it has sponsored in Kashmir. Ali Babar’s story tells us, however, that the Lashkar’s jihad factories remain at work, preparing for that day to come.



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3zU0mNs

Drunk Turkish man, reported missing, participates in his own search operation

Philosophers have often said that people can have better lives if they find themselves and realise their potential. However, in a bizarre incident that took place in Turkey’s Inegöl recently, a man spent hours “searching for himself” literally.

Little did 50-year-old Beyhan Mutlu know that he was about to lead everyone on a wild goose chase when he was enjoying a few drinks with his friends in the city. Inebriated after his wild night out, Mutlu wandered off into the woods near the area. When he did not return for a while, his worried friends went to the police to report him as missing.

The police lodged a missing persons report and launched a search operation to find Mutlu. The police gathered a group and decided to search the area the man was last seen. The group searched the woods for a while, but they did not find the man. Later, when they called out his name, Mutlu answered from within the search group.

Under the influence of alcohol, Mutlu had joined the search party and walked along it, under the belief that the efforts were going on to find somebody else in the forested area. The 50-year-old spent quite a while “searching for himself” in a literal manner.

According to Vaziyet, a Turkish news outlet, Mutlu was later escorted back to his home.

This is not the only strange case about a missing person or object that has gained eyeballs on social media recently.

Just a few days ago, a gravestone in the United States, that had been missing for almost 150 years, was recovered from a house, where it was being used for making fudge.

According to media reports, the gravestone had been in possession of a family who used the white slab to make fudge. It was discovered when the woman who used it was moved to a care facility for Alzheimer's. No one knows how the woman came in possession of the object.

The gravestone has recently been returned to its original place at a cemetery in Michigan.



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3ofrZhR

Great chasm of China: Beijing’s rhetoric and action are far apart, and change seems unlikely

Events of the past month indicate a deepening disconnect between India and China. Developments in Afghanistan, the Quad summit and sustained tensions along the LAC in Eastern Ladakh inform that the bilateral relationship will remain difficult for the foreseeable future. This was apparent from the recent comments by both the Indian ambassador to China and the Chinese ambassador to India during a Track II dialogue last week. The addresses by both diplomats underscored that all was not well in the bilateral relationship. However, both had a very different assessment of the root causes of the problems and how those should be addressed.

For ambassador Sun Weidong, the problems were a product of a deepening “strategic miscalculation” by the Indian side of viewing China as a “major threat” and “strategic rival.” He blamed this on India relying on “outdated western thinking” and viewing ties “from the prism of so-called realism in international relations theories of the West.” In addition, for Sun, Indian policy was increasingly “losing sight of the forest for the trees”, by focussing primarily on the boundary issue. Sun argued that “peace and tranquility in the border areas is important, but it is not the whole story of the bilateral relations.” He called on both sides to “place the border issue in an appropriate position in bilateral relations” and move the current situation from “urgent dispute settlement to regular management and control.”

It is worth noting here that in the same week, Sun’s colleague Qin Gang, China’s ambassador to the US, speaking at an event on China-US ties, emphatically stated that “there isn't any example in the history of international relations where the political relationship between two countries is in competition or even confrontation but other spheres remain safe and sound.” One wonders why Beijing seems to believe that what's good for the goose isn’t good for the gander.

The next part of Sun’s diagnosis was that both sides should focus on ensuring “strategic autonomy” and “development and rejuvenation.” Consequently, what the ambassador wants from New Delhi is for it to steer clear of “ideological bias and Cold War mentality” and engagement with “closed and exclusive small cliques” or an “alliance or quasi alliance” targeting China. These comments reflect Beijing’s increasing discomfort with India’s relationship with the US and more specifically the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue.

Sun, of course, ignores the Chinese leadership’s efforts of engaging in its own minilateral dialogues, which exclude India. The latest example of this is the China, Russia, Iran and Pakistan quartet to coordinate policies related to Afghanistan. The group came together at the sidelines of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) meeting in Dushanbe earlier this month. One wonders why such a grouping was needed when all parties are members of the SCO.

Finally, Sun was critical of the economic measures taken by India in response to the standoff in Eastern Ladakh, and called for “a fair, just and non-discriminatory business environment for Chinese companies.” To him, this is an issue that must be treated as distinct from border tensions. Of course, this view doesn’t concur with Beijing’s own diplomatic practice. China’s economic coercion of Australia is a case in point. For instance, in July this year, when asked about Australian agricultural products losing market share in China, the Chinese foreign ministry’s Zhao Lijian had said that “mutual respect is the foundation and safeguard of practical cooperation between countries. We will not allow any country to reap benefits from doing business with China while groundlessly accusing and smearing China and undermining China's core interests based on ideology.”

In contrast to Sun, ambassador Vikram Misri argued that although there a number of issues that make the India-China dynamic significant “not only for our two countries but also for regional and global peace, prosperity and stability,” “the most pressing issue” between the two sides today is the situation in Eastern Ladakh. Acknowledging “significant progress” on the ground in terms of disengagement along the North and South Banks of the Pangong Lake and Gogra, he expressed hope that “disengagement at the remaining friction areas will enable us to reach a point where we can pick up the threads of bilateral cooperation.” This was an unambiguous reiteration of the view that Beijing cannot expect normalcy in the broader relationship while tensions along the boundary persist.

In addition, the ambassador was critical of attempts to shift goalposts when it comes to the current issue in Eastern Ladakh. In a clear indictment of the PLA’s efforts to force a new status quo using force, Misri argued that “any attempt to confuse border affairs with the Boundary Question is a disservice to the work of those involved in finding solutions... the Indian side has been consistently saying that the current issue is about restoring peace and tranquillity to the border areas and is not about the resolution of the larger Boundary Question, on which our stance has not changed, despite what happened last year.”

Reiterating the “three mutuals” - mutual respect, mutual sensitivity and mutual interests - that External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar had outlined in January 2021, Misri argued that bilateral engagement must be on equal footing. “It cannot be that only one side’s concerns are of relevance while the other side’s case goes unheard,” he said. At this point, it’s also worth noting comments by Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in July ahead of a visit by US Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman. Prior to her arrival, Wang had bristled that “if the US has not learned how to treat other countries as equals by now, then China and the international community as a whole bear the responsibility to teach the US a lesson.” Evidently, there is a chasm between Beijing’s rhetoric and actions.

The final point that Misri highlighted was the challenge of “viewing bilateral relations through the prism of relations with other countries,” and cautioned against “imaginary third factors complicating” the bilateral relationship. This underscored New Delhi’s efforts to assuage Beijing’s concerns with regard to India-US ties. Earlier this month, in a meeting between Jaishankar and Wang Yi in Dushanbe, the Indian foreign minister had reiterated that “it was necessary that China avoid viewing our bilateral relations from the perspective of its relations with third countries.”

Beijing is likely to remain skeptical of such assurances. Its reaction to the outcomes of the Quad summit further underscores this. The fact that the summit outcomes did not touch upon military ties is also unlikely to alter Beijing’s perception. With that said, however, there is little that India can do to help the Chinese leadership in this regard. If Beijing desires a greater sense of security, it must act to facilitate such an environment that addresses the security concerns of others too. This will require introspection and a significant change in the current direction of Chinese policy. However, for the moment this appears highly unlikely, given the current state of Sino-US relations, the deepening sense of ideological confrontation with the West among the Chinese elite and potential domestic political churn ahead of the 20th Party Congress in October 2022.

The author is a Fellow-China Studies at The Takshashila Institution. Views expressed are personal.



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3uA88eJ

Quick drink to death: 22-year-old man dies after allegedly drinking 1.5 litres of cola in 10 minutes

A man in China is said to have died after he quickly drank 1.5 litres of Coca-Cola in a span of 10 minutes, according to doctors. As reported by the Daily Mail, the 22-year-old had drunk the soft drink to cool off in the heat.

The man has been identified as a resident of Beijing. His rapid consumption of Coca-Cola created a fatal build-up of gas inside his body that deprived the man’s liver of oxygen and ultimately led to his demise.

Six hours after he chugged the drink he was rushed to Beijing’s Chaoyang Hospital, after he complained of severe stomach swelling. The initial tests carried out on the patient revealed worrying signs, including an elevated heart rate, rapid breathing, low blood pressure, and Ischemic hepatitis, which is also called “shock liver". Doctors stated that the condition is caused by insufficient flow of blood to the liver.

According to a detailed report by doctors that was published in the Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology journal, the manner in which the man drank the soda lead to a gas building up in his intestines that later leaked into one of the main blood vessels of the liver.

He was given medication to protect his liver and stabilise other body functions from further deterioration, but even after 12 hours, the blood test results showed serious liver damage. The man’s condition worsened further, leading to his death after 18 hours of treatment.

The man was said to have been in good health prior to the incident.

Coca-Cola has not responded to the incident yet. However, Professor Nathan Davies, a biochemist at London’s University College, said that it was “staggeringly unlikely” that the soft drink was to blame for the man’s untimely death.

According to Davies, a bacterial infection could also have been the reason for the gas build-up. He admitted that it may be possible that drinking 1.5 litres of Coca-Cola could have exacerbated the gas build-up, but he believes that it would not be likely.

He added that more information was needed about the man’s health condition than was given in the report to draw accurate conclusions.



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/2Y0DzCn

North Korea fires new 'hypersonic missile': All you need to know about this 'next generation of arms'

North Korea has joined the major powers, such as Russia, China and the United States with its early Tuesday morning test of a new hypersonic missile.

The missile test was North Korea's third round of launches this month.

Kim Jong Un in recent political speeches has vowed to bolster his nuclear program as a deterrent to the US. As the country continues its testing activity, we explain what a hypersonic missile is and what its capabilities are.

What are hypersonic nuclear missiles?

A hypersonic missile travels at speeds of Mach 5 and higher — five times faster than the speed of sound (3,836 mph), which is around 1 mile per second.

Some missiles, such as Russia’s upcoming Kh-47M2 Kinzhal air-launched ballistic missile, are allegedly capable of reaching Mach 10 speeds (7,672 mph) and distances up to 1,200 miles.

They are highly manoeuvrable and do not follow a predictable arc as they travel. They are said to combine the speed of ballistic missiles with the manoeuvring capabilities of cruise missiles. The speed makes them hard to track compared to traditional missile tech.

Hypersonic missiles come in two variants: hypersonic cruise missiles and hypersonic glide vehicles.

“Hypersonic cruise missiles are powered all the way to their targets using an advanced propulsion system called a SCRAMJET. These are very, very fast. You may have six minutes from the time its launched until the time it strikes,” Rich Moore, senior engineer and Rand researcher explained to CNBC.

Hypersonic cruise missiles can fly at altitudes up to 100,000 feet whereas hypersonic glide vehicles can fly above 100,000 feet.

Meanwhile, hypersonic glide vehicles are placed on top of rockets, launched, and then glide on top of the atmosphere.

Advantages of a hypersonic missile

Hypersonic missiles offer a number of advantages over subsonic and supersonic weapons.

A hypersonic weapon system will provide a nation with significantly enhanced strike capabilities. Furthermore, the hypersonic missile can overcome the defences of a heavily defended target such as that of an aircraft carrier.

However, the most critical advantage of a hypersonic missile is that currently there is no operational or reliable method of intercepting them.

Rand senior engineer George Nacouzi added that because hypersonic weapons are manoeuvrable and therefore, unpredictable, they are difficult to defend against.

Countries developing hypersonic missiles

As per a report in partyardmilitary.com, the US is developing a range of advanced hypersonic systems and has awarded Lockheed Martin contracts for the development of two systems: the Hypersonic Conventional Strike Weapon ($928 million) and AGM-183A Air-launched Rapid Response Weapon ($480 million).

China, on the other hand, has a number of ongoing hypersonic projects. The nation is reportedly close to deploying a ballistic missile-launched hypersonic glide vehicle, the DF-17 and has publicly exhibited a scramjet-powered missile, the Ling Yun.

Russia, in July, reported a successful test launch of its new Zircon hypersonic cruise missile. The missile had been fired from the Admiral Gorshkov, a warship in the White Sea. The missile successfully hit a target more than 350 kilometres (about 217 miles) away on the coast of the Barents Sea.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has said the Zircon missile would be capable of flying at nine times the speed of sound and have a range of 1,000 kilometres.

Since 2011, the United Kingdom and France have also been co-developing a hypersonic missile designed to replace the ageing Harpoon and Exocet respectively. The missile, Perseus, is expected to feature an agile and stealthy airframe.

Similarly, India too in 2020, test-fired its first hypersonic missile demonstrator. The indigenous Hypersonic Technology Demonstrator Vehicle has been developed by the Defence Research and Development Organisation.

A new arms race involving hypersonics, considered the next generation of arms, is clearly already underway.

With inputs from agencies



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/2Y15cMl

North Korea fires new 'hypersonic missile': All you need to know about these 'next generation of arms'

North Korea has joined the major powers, such as Russia, China and the United States with its early Tuesday morning test of a new hypersonic missile.

The missile test was North Korea's third round of launches this month.

Kim Jong Un in recent political speeches has vowed to bolster his nuclear program as a deterrent to the US. As the country continues its testing activity, we explain what a hypersonic missile is and what its capabilities are.

What are hypersonic nuclear missiles?

A hypersonic missile travels at speeds of Mach 5 and higher — five times faster than the speed of sound (3,836 mph), which is around 1 mile per second.

Some missiles, such as Russia’s upcoming Kh-47M2 Kinzhal air-launched ballistic missile, are allegedly capable of reaching Mach 10 speeds (7,672 mph) and distances up to 1,200 miles.

They are highly manoeuvrable and do not follow a predictable arc as they travel. They are said to combine the speed of ballistic missiles with the manoeuvring capabilities of cruise missiles. The speed makes them hard to track compared to traditional missile tech.

Hypersonic missiles come in two variants: hypersonic cruise missiles and hypersonic glide vehicles.

“Hypersonic cruise missiles are powered all the way to their targets using an advanced propulsion system called a SCRAMJET. These are very, very fast. You may have six minutes from the time its launched until the time it strikes,” Rich Moore, senior engineer and Rand researcher explained to CNBC.

Hypersonic cruise missiles can fly at altitudes up to 100,000 feet whereas hypersonic glide vehicles can fly above 100,000 feet.

Meanwhile, hypersonic glide vehicles are placed on top of rockets, launched, and then glide on top of the atmosphere.

Advantages of a hypersonic missile

Hypersonic missiles offer a number of advantages over subsonic and supersonic weapons.

A hypersonic weapon system will provide a nation with significantly enhanced strike capabilities. Furthermore, the hypersonic missile can overcome the defences of a heavily defended target such as that of an aircraft carrier.

However, the most critical advantage of a hypersonic missile is that currently there is no operational or reliable method of intercepting them.

Rand senior engineer George Nacouzi added that because hypersonic weapons are manoeuvrable and therefore, unpredictable, they are difficult to defend against.

Countries developing hypersonic missiles

As per a report in partyardmilitary.com, the US is developing a range of advanced hypersonic systems and has awarded Lockheed Martin contracts for the development of two systems: the Hypersonic Conventional Strike Weapon ($928 million) and AGM-183A Air-launched Rapid Response Weapon ($480 million).

China, on the other hand, has a number of ongoing hypersonic projects. The nation is reportedly close to deploying a ballistic missile-launched hypersonic glide vehicle, the DF-17 and has publicly exhibited a scramjet-powered missile, the Ling Yun.

Russia, in July, reported a successful test launch of its new Zircon hypersonic cruise missile. The missile had been fired from the Admiral Gorshkov, a warship in the White Sea. The missile successfully hit a target more than 350 kilometres (about 217 miles) away on the coast of the Barents Sea.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has said the Zircon missile would be capable of flying at nine times the speed of sound and have a range of 1,000 kilometres.

Since 2011, the United Kingdom and France have also been co-developing a hypersonic missile designed to replace the ageing Harpoon and Exocet respectively. The missile, Perseus, is expected to feature an agile and stealthy airframe.

Similarly, India too in 2020, test-fired its first hypersonic missile demonstrator. The indigenous Hypersonic Technology Demonstrator Vehicle has been developed by the Defence Research and Development Organisation.

A new arms race involving hypersonics, considered the next generation of arms, is clearly already underway.

With inputs from agencies



from Firstpost World Latest News https://ift.tt/3EYkcLn